The DOI matches its Crossref record; 207 of the 210 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic literature review of 10 years of research on sex/gender and pain perception – Part 2: Do biopsychosocial factors alter pain sensitivity differently in women and men?
Abstract
This systematic review summarizes the results of 10 years of laboratory research on pain and sex/gender. An electronic search strategy was designed by a medical librarian to access multiple databases. A total of 172 articles published between 1998 and 2008 were retrieved, analyzed, and synthesized. The second set of results presented in this review (129 articles) examined various biopsychosocial factors that may contribute to differences in pain sensitivity between healthy women and men. The results revealed that the involvement of hormonal and physiological factors is either inconsistent or absent. Some studies suggest that temporal summation, allodynia, and secondary hyperalgesia may be more pronounced in women than in men. The evidence to support less efficient endogenous pain inhibitory systems in women is mixed and does not necessarily apply to all pain modalities. With regard to psychological factors, depression may not mediate sex differences in pain perception, while the role of anxiety is ambiguous. Cognitive and social factors appear to partly explain some sex-related differences. Finally, past individual history may be influential in female pain responses. However, these conclusions must be treated with much circumspection for various methodological reasons. Furthermore, some factors/mechanisms remain understudied in the field. There is also a need to assess and improve the ecological validity of findings from laboratory studies on healthy subjects, and perhaps a change of paradigm needs to be considered at this point in time to better understand the factors that influence the experience of women and men who suffer from acute or chronic pain.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, despite a large volume of laboratory-based research in this area, a consistent pattern of sex differences in pain sensitivity, expression and impact has not yet emerged [20].”
From Chronic pain and sex-differences; women accept and move, while men feel blue (2017) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“An inconsistency is also found regarding what extent there are sex differences with respect to different psychological factors [20, 26].”
From Chronic pain and sex-differences; women accept and move, while men feel blue (2017) · cites this paper as [20]
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
A Global Measure of Perceived Stress
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136404 · Cited by 32,807
(1970) · Cited by 24,983
The measurement of psychological androgyny
Bem, S. L. (1974) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0036215 · Cited by 8,522
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation.
Sullivan, M. J. L., Bishop, S. R., & Pivik, J. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037//1040-3590.7.4.524 · Cited by 8,227
Survey of chronic pain in Europe: Prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment
Breivik, H., Collett, B., Ventafridda, V., Cohen, R., & Gallacher, D. (2006) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009 · Cited by 5,486
Anxiety, sensitivity, anxiety frequency, and the prediction of fearfulness
Reiss, S., Peterson, R. A., Gursky, D. M., & McNally, R. J. (1986) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(86)90143-9 · Cited by 3,169
Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings
Fillingim, R. B., King, C. D., Ribeiro-Dasilva, M. C., Rahim-Williams, B., & Riley, J. L. (2009) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2008.12.001 · Cited by 2,766
Rosenstiel, A. K., & Keefe, F. J. (1983) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(83)90125-2 · Cited by 2,314
Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., & Altman, D. G. (2000) · Cited by 2,312
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Goldberg, 2000, Influence of success and failure on pain tolerance., Eur J Psychiatry, 14, 171
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sex differences in pain: a brief review of clinical and experimental findings
Bartley, E. J., & Fillingim, R. B. (2013) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aet127 · Cited by 2,168
The association of sleep and pain: an update and a path forward
Finan, P. H., Goodin, B. R., & Smith, M. T. (2013) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2013.08.007 · Cited by 1,620
Sex differences in pain and pain inhibition: multiple explanations of a controversial phenomenon
Mogil, J. S. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3360 · Cited by 1,065
Samulowitz, A., Gremyr, I., Eriksson, E. M., & Hensing, G. K. E. (2018) · Pain Research and Management · doi:10.1155/2018/6358624 · Cited by 862
Evaluating psychosocial contributions to chronic pain outcomes
Meints, S. M., & Edwards, R. R. (2018) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2018.01.017 · Cited by 719
Metadata
- Authors
- Racine, M., Tousignant-Laflamme, Y., Kloda, L. A., Dion, D., Dupuis, G., & Choinière, M.
- Affiliations
- Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
- McGill University (CA)
- Université de Montréal (CA)
- Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
- Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Choinière, Manon
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 619-635
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066329882
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 210
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 3.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
- Keywords
- sex differences in pain perception, gender differences, pain sensitivity, biopsychosocial model, temporal summation, allodynia, secondary hyperalgesia, endogenous pain inhibition, depression, anxiety, cognitive factors, social factors, history of pain, hormonal factors, women's pain
- MeSH terms
- Biological Factors, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Nervous System, Pain, Psychology, Sex Characteristics, Stress, Psychological, Databases, Bibliographic, Pain Threshold, Biomedical Research, Pain Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review