Cited by 23Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Scopolamine during the paradoxical sleep window impairs radial arm maze learning in rats

LEGAULT, G, SMITH, C, BENINGER, R·2004·Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Abstract

It has been proposed that there are paradoxical sleep windows (PSW) during which REM sleep is required for effective learning. Thus, rats deprived of REM sleep during 0-4 (but not 5-8) h after training show impaired learning of a radial maze task. As cholinergic (ACh) systems are active during REM sleep and may be involved in learning, this experiment investigated the effects on learning of pharmacological manipulation of the cholinergic system during the period identified as the PSW. Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to groups that were physically deprived of REM for 4 h either immediately after training or beginning 4 h after training or treated with the ACh receptor antagonist scopolamine (0-0.4 mg/kg at 0 and 2 h after training or 0.006 mg/kg at 4 and 6 h after training) on each of 9 days of radial maze training. Post-training REM deprivation (0-4 h but not 5-8 h after training) and scopolamine dose-dependently impaired learning. Results suggest that REM sleep and intact ACh neurotransmission are required during the PSW for rats to learn the radial maze task.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pbb.2004.09.018

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Blocking muscarinic cholinergic receptors during REM sleep windows by scopolamine consistently impairs memory in a habit learning version of the radial arm maze.

    “Blocking muscarinic cholinergic receptors during “REM sleep windows” (i.e., time periods after learning in which REM sleep deprivation effectively impaired consolidation of respective materials, see sect.IIB) by administration of scopolamine consistently impaired memory in a habit learning version of the radial arm maze (720, 721).”

    From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [720]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
LEGAULT, G., SMITH, C., & BENINGER, R.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • Trent University (CA)
Corresponding author
BENINGER, R
Venue
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-12
Volume
79
Issue
4
Pages
715-721
ISSN
0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994112273
Cited by
23
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Trent University
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
scopolamine, REM sleep, REM sleep deprivation, cholinergic system, spatial learning, sleep-dependent memory consolidation
MeSH terms
Animals, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Scopolamine, Sleep, REM, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Maze Learning, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review