Scopolamine during the paradoxical sleep window impairs radial arm maze learning in rats
Abstract
It has been proposed that there are paradoxical sleep windows (PSW) during which REM sleep is required for effective learning. Thus, rats deprived of REM sleep during 0-4 (but not 5-8) h after training show impaired learning of a radial maze task. As cholinergic (ACh) systems are active during REM sleep and may be involved in learning, this experiment investigated the effects on learning of pharmacological manipulation of the cholinergic system during the period identified as the PSW. Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to groups that were physically deprived of REM for 4 h either immediately after training or beginning 4 h after training or treated with the ACh receptor antagonist scopolamine (0-0.4 mg/kg at 0 and 2 h after training or 0.006 mg/kg at 4 and 6 h after training) on each of 9 days of radial maze training. Post-training REM deprivation (0-4 h but not 5-8 h after training) and scopolamine dose-dependently impaired learning. Results suggest that REM sleep and intact ACh neurotransmission are required during the PSW for rats to learn the radial maze task.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Blocking muscarinic cholinergic receptors during REM sleep windows by scopolamine consistently impairs memory in a habit learning version of the radial arm maze.
“Blocking muscarinic cholinergic receptors during “REM sleep windows” (i.e., time periods after learning in which REM sleep deprivation effectively impaired consolidation of respective materials, see sect.IIB) by administration of scopolamine consistently impaired memory in a habit learning version of the radial arm maze (720, 721).”
From About Sleep's Role in Memory (2013) · cites this paper as [720]
Cites
Dreaming and the brain: toward a cognitive neuroscience of conscious states
Hobson, J. A., Pace-Schott, E. F., & Stickgold, R. (2000) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00003976 · Cited by 985 · see citing works
Evidence for a paradoxical sleep window for place learning in the Morris water maze
Smith, C., & Rose, G. M. (1996) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/0031-9384(95)02054-3 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Self-citationSleep deprivation by the “flower pot” technique and spatial reference memory
Youngblood, B. D., Zhou, J., Smagin, G. N., Ryan, D. H., & Harris, R. B. S. (1997) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0031-9384(96)00363-0 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Smith, C. T., Conway, J. M., & Rose, G. M. (1998) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1006/nlme.1997.3809 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Self-citationPosttraining paradoxical sleep in rats is increased after spatial learning in the Morris water maze.
Smith, C., & Rose, G. M. (1997) · Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.1037/0735-7044.111.6.1197 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Self-citationAre you awake? Cognitive performance and reverie during the hypnopompic state
Dinges, D. F. (2004) · Sleep and cognition. · doi:10.1037/10499-012 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rasch, B., & Born, J. (2013) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00032.2012 · Cited by 2,783 · see citing works
“Similar results were obtained when blocking muscarinic cholinergic receptors during a PSW by scopolamine (720, 1108), pointing to a crucial involvement of protein synthesis as well as cholinergic activation in PSW-associated memory processes.”
BackgroundResultThe role of rapid eye movement sleep for amygdala-related memory processing
Genzel, L., Spoormaker, V. I., Konrad, B. N., & Dresler, M. (2015) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2015.01.008 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Rasch, B., Gais, S., & Born, J. (2009) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2009.6 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
How to become an expert: a new perspective on the role of sleep in the mastery of procedural skills
Fogel, S. M., Ray, L. B., Binnie, L., & Owen, A. M. (2015) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2015.10.004 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Post-training intra-striatal scopolamine or flupenthixol impairs radial maze learning in rats
LEGAULT, G., SMITH, C., & BENINGER, R. (2006) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2006.02.010 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- LEGAULT, G., SMITH, C., & BENINGER, R.
- Affiliations
- Queen's University (CA)
- Trent University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- BENINGER, R
- ORCID
- SMITH, C
- Venue
- Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 715-721
- ISSN
- 0091-3057 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994112273
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Trent University
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- scopolamine, REM sleep, REM sleep deprivation, cholinergic system, spatial learning, sleep-dependent memory consolidation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Scopolamine, Sleep, REM, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Maze Learning, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review