Cited by 64Cardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsHealthcare Systems and Public HealthHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

From Framingham to North Karelia

Puska, Pekka·2010·Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases

Abstract

The Framingham study was a landmark study that, already in the 1960s, gave strong evidence as to the likely causal role of several lifestyle-linked factors in the development of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Men in Finland had at that time the highest mortality rates of coronary heart disease in the world, a finding that raised much local concern. In 1972, a pioneering project by a young leadership team and with many partners, including World Health Organization, was started to change the situation. The project was based on the results for Framingham and some other classical studies to carry out a comprehensive prevention program to reduce the risk factor levels in the population through general lifestyle changes in the pilot area of North Karelia. Later on, the work was transferred to national level. Over the years, great reductions in the population levels of the risk factors took place, associated with dramatic reduction in age-adjusted CVD mortality rates and improvement in public health. The experience of diminishing the prevalence of risk factors in the population is a powerful demonstration of how the CVD epidemic can be successfully confronted-thatis, how the Framingham results can effectively be used for major progress in public health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pcad.2010.01.003

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Puska, P.
Affiliations
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (FI)
Corresponding author
Puska, Pekka
Venue
Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-07
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
15-20
ISSN
0033-0620 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W203190679
Cited by
64
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
Framingham Heart Study, North Karelia Project, cardiovascular disease prevention, coronary artery disease, cardiovascular risk factors, lifestyle modification, cardiovascular mortality reduction, public health interventions
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Finland, Humans, International Cooperation, Male, National Health Programs, National Institutes of Health (U.S.), Population Surveillance, Public Health, Risk Factors, Time Factors, United States, Global Health, Risk Assessment, Evidence-Based Medicine, History, 20th Century, History, 21st Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review