Cited by 106Medication Adherence and ComplianceDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and Research

Insulin adherence in patients with diabetes: risk factors for injection omission

Farsaei, Shadi, Radfar, Mania, Heydari, Zahra, Abbasi, Farzaneh, Qorbani, Mostafa·2014·Primary care diabetes

Abstract

Aims The purpose of this study was to evaluate adherence to insulin therapy in patients with diabetes. The underlying factors affecting insulin injection omission among patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes were also investigated.Methods This cross-sectional study has been conducted on 507 patients with diabetes. Adherence to insulin therapy was measured by the 8-Item Moriskey Medication Adherence Scale (MMS) and the autocompliance method. Furthermore, socio-demographic, disease and injection-related barriers to insulin injection were assessed.Results Based on the Morisky Green test, 14.3% and 28.8% of patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes respectively had low adherence to insulin therapy. However, almost all patients were adherent according to the autocompliance method. Different factors showed a significant association with insulin compliance in both groups.Conclusions The current study suggests acceptable adherence to insulin therapy among patients with type 1, and poor adherence in patients with type 2, diabetes. Our findings regarding barriers with significant effect on insulin adherence may be useful to identify patients at risk for low compliance, and to guide the design of proper strategies to improve adherence and the consequential clinical outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pcd.2014.03.001

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farsaei, S., Radfar, M., Heydari, Z., Abbasi, F., & Qorbani, M.
Affiliations
  • Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (IR)
  • Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute (IR)
  • Children's Medical Center (IR)
  • Iran University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Radfar, Mania
Venue
Primary care diabetes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-12
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
338-345
ISSN
1751-9918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1963717917
Cited by
106
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 3
FWCI
7.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Primary care diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Tehran University of Medical Sciences (10736-33-02-89)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
insulin adherence, insulin therapy, type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, medication adherence, Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Injections, Insulin, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Medication Adherence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review