Cited by 15Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Education

First real-world experience with bigfoot unity: a 6-month retrospective analysis

Open access
Baliga, Bantwal S., Tillman, John B., Olson, Byron, Vaughan, Sarah, Sheikh, F. Naureen, Malone, James K.·2023·Clinical Diabetes

Abstract

The Bigfoot Unity Diabetes Management System, a smart pen cap system cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in May 2021, incorporates continuous glucose monitoring data, real-time glycemic alerts, and clinician-directed dose recommendations. This study analyzed real-world clinical outcomes data for an initial cohort (n = 58, from 13 clinics) managing multiple daily injection insulin therapy using the pen cap system for 6 months. We examined glycemic control, including hypoglycemia events and interaction with and use of the pen cap system. In a cohort mainly consisting of adults with type 2 diabetes and an average age of 62 years, the results demonstrate close adherence to established glycemic targets, including a relatively short amount of time spent in the hypoglycemic range.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/cd22-0126

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prospective 6-month study reported here showed similar results to 3-month data presented previously and similar glycemic control to a retrospective cohort using Bigfoot Unity.

    “In general, the prospective 6-month study reported here showed similar results to 3-month data presented previously (35) and similar glycemic control to a retrospective cohort using Bigfoot Unity (34); here, the baseline HbA1c was higher (9.1% vs 8.4%), which may reflect health status or other demographic biases in those who consent to participate in an ongoing study vs those who do not (36).”
  • In a subset of participants with baseline HbA1c ≥ 8%, the magnitude of the observed difference was larger (approximately 1.5%).

    “Similar to other investigations (34, 37), in a subset of participants with suboptimal glycemic control (those with baseline HbA1c ≥ 8%), the magnitude of the observed difference was larger (approximately 1.5% here) which may reflect regression to the mean phenomenon.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baliga, B. S., Tillman, J. B., Olson, B., Vaughan, S., Sheikh, F. N., & Malone, J. K.
Affiliations
  • Texas Diabetes & Endocrinology (US)
  • Bigfoot Biomedical (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Tillman, John B.
Venue
Clinical Diabetes
Published
2023-06-21
Volume
41
Issue
4
Pages
539-548
ISSN
  • 0891-8929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-4953
OpenAlex
W4381510683
Cited by
15
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bigfoot Biomedical
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
continuous glucose monitoring, type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, hypoglycemia, dose recommendations, real-world outcomes, device adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review