Cited by 192Physical Activity and HealthMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsBehavioral Health and Interventions

Effectiveness of an online computer-tailored physical activity intervention in a real-life setting

Open access
Spittaels, H., De Bourdeaudhuij, I, Brug, J, Vandelanotte, C·2006·Health Education Research

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a computer-tailored physical activity intervention delivered through the Internet in a real-life setting. Healthy adults (n=526), recruited in six worksites, between 25 and 55 years of age were randomized to one of three conditions receiving, respectively, (i) online-tailored physical activity advice + stage-based reinforcement e-mails, (ii) online-tailored physical activity advice only, (iii) online non-tailored standard physical activity advice. At 6-month follow-up, no differences in physical activity between study conditions were found; total physical activity, physical activity at moderate intensity and physical activity in leisure time significantly increased in all study conditions between baseline and follow-up. Further evaluation of the intervention materials showed that the tailored advice was more read, printed and discussed with others than the standard advice. Most of the respondents in the e-mail group indicated to be satisfied about the number, frequency and usefulness of the stage-based e-mails. In conclusion, although tailored advice was appreciated more than standard advice, no evidence was found that an online-tailored physical activity intervention program outperformed online standard information.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/her/cyl096

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spittaels, H., De Bourdeaudhuij, I., Brug, J., & Vandelanotte, C.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Venue
Health Education Research
Published
2006-08-31
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
385-396
ISSN
  • 0268-1153 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-3648
OpenAlex
W2138711756
Cited by
192
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 20
FWCI
7.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Health Education Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
computer-tailored intervention, physical activity promotion, online health advice, workplace health promotion, intervention effectiveness, leisure-time physical activity, moderate physical activity, user satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Belgium, Computer-Assisted Instruction, Consumer Behavior, Counseling, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Occupational Health Services, Online Systems, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reinforcement, Psychology, Program Evaluation, Internet, Information Dissemination, Electronic Mail

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review