Cited by 25Smoking Behavior and CessationMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Missing the mark for patient engagement: mHealth literacy strategies and behavior change processes in smoking cessation apps

Open access
Paige, Samantha R., Alber, Julia M., Stellefson, Michael L., Krieger, Janice L.·2018·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective To examine how Transtheoretical Model (TTM)'s processes of change and mHealth literacy strategies are employed in mobile smoking cessation apps.Methods A purposive sample of 100 iTunes apps were coded to assess descriptive (price, type, developer, user-rating) and engagement metrics, including processes of change and mHealth literacy strategies (plain language, usability, interactivity). One-way ANOVAs and independent samples t-tests examined associations between descriptive and engagement metrics.Results Over half of the apps included 7 (78%) processes of change. Fewer included self-liberation (36%) and reinforcement management (34%). Most apps incorporated plain language, but few integrated usability and interactivity strategies. Hypnotherapy and informational apps included more behavioral processes of change than apps incorporating a combination of features, including gaming, cigarette trackers, and motivational coaching (p<0.01).Conclusion Apps included behavior change processes but rarely incorporated usability and interactivity features to promote patient engagement. Engagement metrics did not vary by app user-ratings, price-to-download, or developer, including for-profit organizations or government and educational institutions.Practice implications Providers should acknowledge the popularity of smoking cessation apps as potential cessation aids and communicate their benefits and drawbacks to patients. Future efforts to improve smoking cessation apps should focus on enhancing the quality of tailored and interactive content.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2017.11.006

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Paige, S. R., Alber, J. M., Stellefson, M. L., & Krieger, J. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • California Polytechnic State University (US)
  • East Carolina University (US)
Corresponding author
Paige, Samantha R.
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
101
Issue
5
Pages
951-955
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2767852500
Cited by
25
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (F31HL132463)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
smoking cessation apps, transtheoretical model, change processes, patient engagement, app usability, plain language, interactivity, mobile health apps
MeSH terms
Biobehavioral Sciences, Humans, Motivation, Patient Participation, Smoking Cessation, Telemedicine, Health Literacy, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review