Cited by 118Digital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealth Policy Implementation Science

Implementing internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for common mental health disorders: A comparative case study of implementation challenges perceived by therapists and managers in five European internet services

Open access
Folker, Anna Paldam, Mathiasen, Kim, Lauridsen, Sigurd Mørk, Stenderup, Ellen, Dozeman, Els, Folker, Marie Paldam·2018·Internet Interventions

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy programs have been developed and evaluated in randomized controlled trials during the past two decades to alleviate the rising demand for effective treatment of common mental health disorders such as anxiety and depression. While most of the research on internet-based cognitive behavior therapy (iCBT) has focused on efficacy and effectiveness only little attention has been devoted to the implementation of iCBT. The aim of this study was to identify the main implementation challenges perceived by therapists and managers involved in the practical operation of iCBT services in routine care settings in five European countries. METHOD: The study was designed as a multiple comparative case study to explore differences and similarities between five different iCBT services in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, The Netherlands and Scotland. Field visits were carried out to each of the five services including interviews with the management of the service (n = 9), focus group interviews with key staff (n = 15) and demonstration of online programs. The data material was processed through thematic, comparative analysis. RESULTS: The analysis generated four transversal themes: 1) integration in the mental health care system; 2) recruitment of patients; 3) working practice of therapists; and 4) long-term sustainability of service. The main results concerned the need to address the informal integration in the health care systems related to the perceived skepticism towards iCBT from GPs and face-to-face therapists, the role of referral models and communication strategies for the stable recruitment of patients, the need for knowledge, standards and material for the training of therapists in the provision of online feedback, the need to improve the possibilities to tailor programs to individual patients, and the need for considerate long-term sustainability planning of the transitions from local projects to permanent regional or national services. CONCLUSION: The present study gives an overview of the main implementation challenges regarding the practical operation of iCBT services perceived by the therapists and managers of the iCBT services. Future studies into specific details of each challenge will be important to strengthen the evidence base of iCBT and to improve uptake and implementation of iCBT in routine care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.invent.2018.02.001

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BTB has been rolled out to NHS primary care across Scotland as one of its low intensity treatments and in self-guided format for patients with mild to moderate anxiety and depression.

    “It has also been rolled out to NHS primary care across Scotland as one of its low intensity treatments and in self-guided format for patients with mild to moderate anxiety and depression (Du et al ., 2013; Folker et al ., 2018; NHS Lothian, 2019; The Scottish Government, 2017).”

    From A qualitative study of patients’ experiences and acceptance of computerised cognitive behavioural therapy in primary care, Scotland (2021) · cites this paper as Folker et al., 2018

    Methods > Case study selection (page unavailable) says Beating the Blues was offered at six NHS Health Boards in Scotland and used as an automated, therapist-free service in primary care. Table 1 lists it as unguided iCBT for depression and anxiety. The copy does not specify that it was classified as a low-intensity treatment or limited to patients with mild to moderate symptoms. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Computerised cognitive behavioural therapy (CCBT) has been made available within the National Health Service (NHS) across Scotland as an alternative treatment for mild to moderate anxiety and depression.

    “Computerised cognitive behavioural therapy (CCBT) has been made available within the National Health Service (NHS) across Scotland as an alternative treatment for mild to moderate anxiety and depression.”

    From A qualitative study of patients’ experiences and acceptance of computerised cognitive behavioural therapy in primary care, Scotland (2021) · cites this paper as Folker et al., 2018

    The Methods (Case study selection; page not provided) say that the computerised CBT service Beating the Blues was offered at six NHS Health Boards in Scotland and treated depression and anxiety. The paper does not specify that it was for mild to moderate cases, and six boards does not establish availability throughout Scotland. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Insufficient information for patients can lead to inappropriate referrals or an incorrect match between patients and programmes.

    “Moreover, insufficient information for patients can lead to inappropriate referrals (Bennett et al ., 2008) or an incorrect match between patients and programmes (Folker et al ., 2018).”

    From A qualitative study of patients’ experiences and acceptance of computerised cognitive behavioural therapy in primary care, Scotland (2021) · cites this paper as Folker et al., 2018

    The Results section (“Recruitment of patients”; page not provided) reports that patients were referred to services that did not match their needs. It discusses communication separately but does not say that insufficient information for patients caused those mismatches. The inappropriate-referrals clause is attributed to Bennett et al., not Folker et al. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Researchers noted that a GP's referral of a patient for CCBT could take a month and suggested that self-referral would be a much faster option, which would also help improve accessibility of CCBT services.

    “Researchers also noted that a GP ' s referral of a patient for CCBT could take a month and suggested that selfreferral would be a much faster option. It would also help to improve accessibility of CCBT services (Folker et al ., 2018; Titov et al ., 2018).”
  • This study complements research concerning the constraints on implementation of CCBT services and might shed light on potential reasons for poor engagement of patients and high drop-out rates.

    “In addition, this study complements research concerning the constraints on implementation of CCBT services (Folker et al ., 2018), and might shed light on potential reasons for poor engagement of patients (Apolinario-Hagen et al ., 2017) and high drop-out rates.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Folker, A. P., Mathiasen, K., Lauridsen, S. M., Stenderup, E., Dozeman, E., & Folker, M. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • GGZ inGeest (NL)
Corresponding author
Folker, Anna Paldam
Venue
Internet Interventions
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
11
Pages
60-70
ISSN
2214-7829 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2789586768
Cited by
116
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7
FWCI
14.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Internet Interventions (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
TrygFonden (113360)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, implementation barriers, common mental disorders, anxiety, depression, usual care, therapist training, online feedback, referral model, patient recruitment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review