The DOI matches its Crossref record; 824 of the 824 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using the MATRICS to guide development of a preclinical cognitive test battery for research in schizophrenia
Open accessAbstract
Cognitive deficits in schizophrenia are among the core symptoms of the disease, correlate with functional outcome, and are not well treated with current antipsychotic therapies. In order to bring together academic, industrial, and governmental bodies to address this great ‘unmet therapeutic need’, the NIMH sponsored the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) initiative. Through careful factor analysis and consensus of expert opinion, MATRICS identified seven domains of cognition that are deficient in schizophrenia (attention/vigilance, working memory, reasoning and problem solving, processing speed, visual learning and memory, verbal learning and memory, and social cognition) and recommended a specific neuropsychological test battery to probe these domains. In order to move the field forward and outline an approach for translational research, there is a need for a “preclinical MATRICS” to develop a rodent test battery that is appropriate for drug development. In this review, we outline such an approach and review current rodent tasks that target these seven domains of cognition. The rodent tasks are discussed in terms of their validity for probing each cognitive domain as well as a brief overview of the pharmacology and manipulations relevant to schizophrenia for each task.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Posner, M. I. (1980) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/00335558008248231 · Cited by 9,670 · cited 1×
“Following validation of the task, demonstrating increased RTs to invalid (misleading) cues compared to valid (beneficial) cues, as per attentional theory (Posner, 1980), (Rosner and Mittleman, 1996) lesioned the post-parietal cortex (PPC) of rats.”
The attention system of the human brain
Posner, M. I., & Petersen, S. E. (1990) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000325 · Cited by 8,070 · cited 1×
“Surprisingly, however, parietal cortex lesions do not impair rat performance of the 5-CSR task (Muir et al., 1996a), despite this area being the presumed locus of the posterior attentional system in primates where damage has been linked to attentional disturbances (Posner & Petersen, 1990).”
Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat
Morris, R. (1984) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/0165-0270(84)90007-4 · Cited by 7,180
Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions
Morris, R. G. M., Garrud, P., Rawlins, J. N. P., & O'Keefe, J. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/297681a0 · Cited by 6,340
A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: A molecular basis for odor recognition
Buck, L., & Axel, R. (1991) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(91)90418-x · Cited by 4,987
Meeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition
Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1884 · Cited by 3,782
What are the functional consequences of neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia?
(1996) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.153.3.321 · Cited by 3,516
The Medial Temporal Lobe Memory System
Squire, L. R., & Zola-Morgan, S. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1896849 · Cited by 3,282
A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. 1: behavioral data
Ennaceur, A., & Delacour, J. (1988) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0166-4328(88)90157-x · Cited by 3,223
Neurocognitive deficit in schizophrenia: A quantitative review of the evidence.
Heinrichs, R. W., & Zakzanis, K. K. (1998) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.12.3.426 · Cited by 2,798
Cited by
Millan, M. J., Agid, Y., Brüne, M., Bullmore, E. T., Carter, C. S., Clayton, N. S., Connor, R., Davis, S., Deakin, B., DeRubeis, R. J., et al. (2012) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd3628 · Cited by 1,292
Self-citationAnimal models of schizophrenia
Jones, C., Watson, D., & Fone, K. (2011) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01386.x · Cited by 771
Animal models of human disease: challenges in enabling translation
McGonigle, P., & Ruggeri, B. (2014) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2013.08.006 · Cited by 610
Neill, J. C., Barnes, S., Cook, S., Grayson, B., Idris, N. F., McLean, S. L., Snigdha, S., Rajagopal, L., & Harte, M. K. (2010) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2010.07.004 · Cited by 530
Bussey, T. J., Holmes, A., Lyon, L., Mar, A. C., McAllister, K. A. L., Nithianantharajah, J., Oomen, C. A., & Saksida, L. M. (2012) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.04.011 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Young, J. W., Powell, S. B., Risbrough, V., Marston, H. M., & Geyer, M. A.
- Venue
- Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 150-202
- ISSN
- 0163-7258 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2020326582
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 824
- FWCI
- 19.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using the MATRICS to guide development of a preclinical cognitive test battery for research in schizophrenia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2009.02.004
- The paper
- Young, J. W., Powell, S. B., Risbrough, V., Marston, H. M., & Geyer, M. A. (2009). Using the MATRICS to guide development of a preclinical cognitive test battery for research in schizophrenia. Pharmacology & Therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2009.02.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
