Cited by 42Forensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentAlkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology

Pharmacologic Characterization of Substituted Nitazenes at μ, κ, and Δ Opioid Receptors Suggests High Potential for Toxicity

Open access
Kozell, Laura B., Eshleman, Amy J., Wolfrum, Katherine M., Swanson, Tracy L., Bloom, Shelley H., Benware, Sheila, Schmachtenberg, Jennifer L., Schutzer, Kamryn A. +3 more·2024·The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics

Abstract

The benzimidazole opioids (substituted nitazenes) are highly potent μ opiod receptor (MOR) agonists with heroin- or fentanyl-like effects. These compounds have caused hospitalizations and fatal overdoses. We characterized the in vitro pharmacology and structure-activity relationships of 19 nitazenes with substitutions at three positions of the benzimidazole core. Affinities were assessed using agonist radioligand binding assays at human μ, κ, and Δ opioid receptors (MOR, KOR, and DOR, respectively) heterologously expressed in CHO cells. Notably, for MOR binding, nine substituted nitazenes had significantly higher affinities than fentanyl including N-pyrrolidino etonitazene, N-pyrrilidino isonitazene, and N-desethyl isotonitazene; 13 had subnanomolar affinities. Only metodesnitazene and flunitazene had significantly lower affinities than fentanyl. Affinities for the substituted nitazenes at KOR and DOR relative to MOR were 46- to 2580-fold and 180- to 1280-fold lower, respectively. Functional activities were assessed using [35 S]GTP γ S binding assays. Four nitazenes had subnanomolar potencies at MOR: N-pyrrolidino etonitazene, N-pyrrilidino isonitazene, N-pyrrilidino protonitazene and N-desethyl isotonitazene. Ten substituted nitazenes had significantly higher potencies than fentanyl. All tested nitazenes were full MOR agonists. Potencies at KOR and DOR relative to MOR were 7.3- to 7920-fold and 24- to 9400-fold lower, respectively. Thus, many of these compounds are high affinity/high potency MOR agonists with elevated potential to elicit toxicity and overdose at low doses. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Substituted nitazenes are a growing public health threat. Although the 19 nitazenes tested vary in their opioid receptor pharmacology, a number are very high affinity, high potency, and high efficacy compounds- higher than fentanyl. Their pharmacology suggests high potential for harm.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1124/jpet.123.002052

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Isotonitazene's high receptor potency and potential for active metabolites help explain why intoxications present with profound central nervous system depression, miosis, and respiratory depression even when the exposure history may be unclear.

    “From a clinical standpoint, isotonitazene’s high receptor potency and potential for active metabolites help explain why intoxications present with profound central nervous system depression, miosis, and respiratory depression even when the exposure history may be unclear [6].”

    From Novel 2-Benzylbenzimidazole Opioids: Emerging Drugs of Abuse and Pharmacological Considerations with Nitazene Analogs (2026) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) identifies N-desethyl isotonitazene as an isotonitazene metabolite with similar μ-opioid receptor affinity and higher potency, and reports respiratory depression associated with it. The Introduction describes respiratory distress, confusion, and possible coma as signs of nitazene toxicity. The copy does not establish miosis or an unclear exposure history as features of isotonitazene intoxication. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Etonitazene use can cause very high opioid toxicity, especially respiratory depression, even when the drug is present in very small amounts.

    “These findings support the clinical expectation that etonitazene use can cause very high opioid toxicity, especially the common side effect of opioids being respiratory depression, even when the drug is present in very small amounts, highlighting its high potency [6].”

    From Novel 2-Benzylbenzimidazole Opioids: Emerging Drugs of Abuse and Pharmacological Considerations with Nitazene Analogs (2026) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Results (section 2.1; page unavailable) report very high μ-opioid receptor affinity for etonitazene, supporting its high potency at low concentrations. The Introduction identifies respiratory distress as a sign of nitazene toxicity, but the paper does not establish that very small amounts of etonitazene specifically cause respiratory depression in people. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Metonitazene can produce opioid activation at low concentrations, so unexpected exposure through counterfeit tablets or mixed drug supplies creates an increased risk of overdose.

    “Because metonitazene can produce opioid activation at low concentrations, unexpected exposure through counterfeit tablets or mixed drug supplies create an increased risk of someone having a overdose [6].”

    From Novel 2-Benzylbenzimidazole Opioids: Emerging Drugs of Abuse and Pharmacological Considerations with Nitazene Analogs (2026) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Results (section 2.3; page unavailable) report that metonitazene activates μ-opioid receptors at low nanomolar concentrations. The Discussion links nitazenes to overdose potential, but the passages do not address unexpected exposure through counterfeit tablets or mixed drug supplies, so that specific risk scenario is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Activation of the mu opioid receptor by 2-benzylbenzimidazole opioids inhibits ascending nociceptive signaling but also suppresses brainstem respiratory drive, explaining why severe opioid toxidromes can occur after a small exposure.

    “The 2-benzylbenzimidazole opioids primarily exert their effects through the agonism of the mu opioid receptor. Activation of this receptor inhibits ascending nociceptive signaling but also suppresses brainstem respiratory drive, which explains why severe opioid toxidromes can occur after a small exposure [6, 16].”

    From Novel 2-Benzylbenzimidazole Opioids: Emerging Drugs of Abuse and Pharmacological Considerations with Nitazene Analogs (2026) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Abstract and Discussion (page not provided) describe substituted nitazenes as potent, selective mu-opioid receptor agonists and report antinociception, respiratory depression, and overdose risk. They do not identify inhibition of ascending nociceptive signaling or suppression of brainstem respiratory drive as the mechanisms, or establish that a small exposure causes a severe toxidrome. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In vitro studies show that many nitazene analogs demonstrate high mu opioid receptor affinity, high functional potency and agonist activity, with multiple agents producing opioid receptor activation comparable to or greater than fentanyl.

    “In vitro studies show that many nitazene analogs demonstrate high mu opioid receptor affinity, high functional potency and agonist activity, with multiple agents that produce opioid receptor activation comparable to or greater than fentanyl [6].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kozell, L. B., Eshleman, A. J., Wolfrum, K. M., Swanson, T. L., Bloom, S. H., Benware, S., Schmachtenberg, J. L., Schutzer, K. A., Schutzer, W. E., Janowsky, A., & Abbas, A. I.
Affiliations
Portland VA Medical Center (US)
Venue
The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-05
Volume
389
Issue
2
Pages
219-228
ISSN
0022-3565 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392564830
Cited by
42
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 6
FWCI
9.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Justice
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (ADA12013, 14S-RCS-006)
  • American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
  • Oregon Health and Science University
  • Portland VA Research Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (-0001)
  • United States Drug Enforcement Administration (D-22-OD-0001)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology
Keywords
mu-opioid receptor, kappa opioid receptor, delta opioid receptor, opioid receptor affinity, structure-activity relationship, opioid overdose, opioid toxicity, etonitazene, GTPgammaS binding
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Opioid, Animals, Benzimidazoles, Cricetulus, Fentanyl, Cricetinae, Humans, Receptors, Opioid, mu, Receptors, Opioid, delta, Receptors, Opioid, kappa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review