Cited by 57Sexual Differentiation and DisordersNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities

Spatial memory performance in androgen insensitive male rats

JONES, B, WATSON, N·2005·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

Masculinization of the developing rodent brain critically depends on the process of aromatization of circulating testosterone (T) to its estrogenic metabolite 17beta-estradiol, which subsequently interacts with estrogen receptors to permanently masculinize the brain. However, it remains unclear what role other androgenic mechanisms may play in the process of masculinization. A novel way of examining this is through the study of male rats that express the tfm mutation of the androgen receptor (AR) gene; such males are fully androgen insensitive and manifest a female phenotype due to a failure of AR-mediated masculinization of peripheral structures. Because tfm-affected males develop secretory testes and have near-normal T titers during development, aromatization would be expected to proceed normally, and brain mechanisms may be developmentally masculinized despite the feminized periphery. We compared tfm-affected males (X(tfm)Y) with normal males and females in the Morris Water Maze, a task in which males typically perform better than females. Performance of tfm-affected males was intermediate between that of normal males and females. While an overall male superiority was found in the task, the X(tfm)Y group reached male-typical escape latencies faster than females. Furthermore, in the X(tfm)Y group, the granule cell layer of the dentate gyrus was significantly larger than in females. These results support the suggestion that that AR mediated mechanisms contribute to the mascu…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.03.023

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
JONES, B., & WATSON, N.
Affiliations
Simon Fraser University (CA)
Corresponding author
WATSON, N
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-06-02
Volume
85
Issue
2
Pages
135-141
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079222886
Cited by
57
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Keywords
androgen receptor, androgen insensitivity syndrome, spatial memory, Morris water maze, sex differences in learning, aromatization, estradiol, dentate gyrus, granular layer, hippocampal morphology, sex differences in behavior
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Female, Feminization, Male, Memory, Mutation, Rats, Mutant Strains, Receptors, Androgen, Sex Characteristics, Spatial Behavior, Androgen-Insensitivity Syndrome, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Maze Learning, Dentate Gyrus, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review