Cited by 90Sport Psychology and PerformanceSports Performance and TrainingMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

The effects of different pre-game motivational interventions on athlete free hormonal state and subsequent performance in professional rugby union matches

Cook, Christian J., Crewther, Blair T.·2012·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

We examined the effect of different pre-match motivational interventions on athlete free testosterone (T) and cortisol (C) concentrations and subsequent match performance in professional rugby union. Male participants (n=12) playing at a senior or academy level in rugby union were recruited and each completed three interventions (15 min each) before a competitive game; 1) watching a video clip of successful skill execution by the player with positive coach feedback [VPCF1]; 2) watching a video clip of successful skill execution by an opposing player with cautionary coach feedback [VCCF], 3) the player left alone to self-motivate [SM1]. The first and last interventions were retested [VPCF2 and SM2]. Salivary free T and C measures were taken pre-intervention and pre-game. Within each game, players were rated by coaching staff on a key performance indicator (KPI) from identified skills and an overall performance indicator (OPI), where 1 = best performance to 5 = worst performance. The VPCF1 and VPCF2 interventions both promoted significant T responses (11.8% to 12.5%) before each game and more so than SM1, SM2 and VCCF. The VCCF approach produced the largest C response (17.6%) and this differed from all other treatments. The VPCF interventions were also associated with better game KPI (1.5 to 1.8) and OPI ratings (1.7 to 1.8) than SM1, SM2 and/or VCCF. Across all treatments, greater individual T responses and lower C responses were associated with better KPI and OPI outcomes. In conclusion, the pre-game presentation of motivational strategies to athletes involving specific video footage and coach feedback produced different outcomes on two indicators of match performance, which were also associated with changes in free hormonal state.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.05.009

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cook, C. J., & Crewther, B. T.
Affiliations
Swansea University (GB)
Corresponding author
Crewther, Blair T.
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
106
Issue
5
Pages
683-688
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055192729
Cited by
90
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 2
FWCI
11.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council UK
  • UK Sports Council
  • Elite Sport Performance Research in Training (ESPRIT) with Pervasive Sensing Programme (EP/H009744/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
free testosterone, cortisol, rugby union, match performance, coach feedback, video feedback, self-motivation, key performance indicators, professional athletes
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Football, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Male, Motivation, Photic Stimulation, Testosterone, Statistics, Nonparametric, Feedback, Psychological, Athletic Performance, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review