The DOI matches its Crossref record; 345 of the 349 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The sense of should: A biologically-based framework for modeling social pressure
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
What is social pressure, and how could it be adaptive to conform to others' expectations? Existing accounts highlight the importance of reputation and social sanctions. Yet, conformist behavior is multiply determined: sometimes, a person desires social regard, but at other times she feels obligated to behave a certain way, regardless of any reputational benefit-i.e. she feels a sense of should. We develop a formal model of this sense of should, beginning from a minimal set of biological premises: that the brain is predictive, that prediction error has a metabolic cost, and that metabolic costs are prospectively avoided. It follows that unpredictable environments impose metabolic costs, and in social environments these costs can be reduced by conforming to others' expectations. We elaborate on a sense of should's benefits and subjective experience, its likely developmental trajectory, and its relation to embodied mental inference. From this individualistic metabolic strategy, the emergent dynamics unify social phenomenon ranging from status quo biases, to communication and motivated cognition. We offer new solutions to long-studied problems (e.g. altruistic behavior), and show how compliance with arbitrary social practices is compelled without explicit sanctions. Social pressure may provide a foundation in individuals on which societies can be built.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In this way, sociocultural and environmental factors transmit emotion concepts to the new generations as a tool for regulating the body and each other.50,51,[154][155][156]”
From A new science of emotion: implications for functional neurological disorder (2022) · cites this paper as [154]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
Austin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: 50th Anniversary Edition
Kuhn, T. S., & Hacking, I. (2012) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226458144.001.0001 · Cited by 21,170
Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison
D’Amico, R. (1978) · Telos · doi:10.3817/0678036169 · Cited by 19,439
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Morvan, C., & O’Connor, A. (2017) · Macat Library eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781912282432 · Cited by 18,284
The psychology of interpersonal relations
Heider, F. (1958) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2089062 · Cited by 17,189
Russell, J. A. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077714 · Cited by 16,334
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison.
Zukin, S., Foucault, M., & Sheridan, A. (1996) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2077073 · Cited by 15,381
The psychology of interpersonal relations.
Heider, F. (1958) · doi:10.1037/10628-000 · Cited by 13,457
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Kant, 2003, The critique of pure reason, Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
- Moreno, 2003, From basic adaptivity to early mind: the origin and evolution of cognitive capacities, Evol Cogn, 9, 12
- Moreno, 2015, vol. 12
- Pavlov, 2018, Nobel lecture: physiology of digestion, NobelPrize.Org
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Computational models link cellular mechanisms of neuromodulation to large-scale neural dynamics
Shine, J. M., Müller, E. J., Munn, B., Cabral, J., Moran, R., & Breakspear, M. J. (2021) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-021-00824-6 · Cited by 249
The power of predictions: An emerging paradigm for psychological research
Hutchinson, J. B., & Barrett, L. F. (2019) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721419831992 · Cited by 216
Self-citationA new science of emotion: implications for functional neurological disorder
Jungilligens, J., Paredes-Echeverri, S., Popkirov, S., Barrett, L. F., & Perez, D. L. (2022) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awac204 · Cited by 164
Self-citationInteroception as modeling, allostasis as control
Sennesh, E., Theriault, J., Brooks, D., van de Meent, J.-W., Barrett, L. F., & Quigley, K. S. (2022) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2021.108242 · Cited by 107
Self-citationAllostasis as a core feature of hierarchical gradients in the human brain
Katsumi, Y., Theriault, J. E., Quigley, K. S., & Barrett, L. F. (2022) · Network Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/netn_a_00240 · Cited by 88
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Theriault, J. E., Young, L., & Barrett, L. F.
- Affiliations
- Northeastern University (US)
- Boston College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Theriault, Jordan E.
- Venue
- Physics of Life Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-03
- Volume
- 36
- Pages
- 100-136
- ISSN
- 1571-0645 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8645214
- OpenAlex
- W3002114662
- Cited by
- 201
- References
- 349
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 18
- FWCI
- 4.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Physics of Life Reviews (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Keywords
- social pressure, conformity, social expectations, metabolic cost, prediction error, predictive brain, social sanctions, reputation, status quo bias, motivated cognition, altruism
- MeSH terms
- Altruism, Brain, Cognition, Emotions, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Social Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
