Cited by 137Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationSex and Gender in HealthcarePain Management and Opioid Use

Gender differences in chronic pain—findings from a population-based study of Norwegian adults

Rustøen, Tone, Wahl, Astrid Klopstad, Hanestad, Berit Rokne, Lerdal, Anners, Paul, Steven, Miaskowski, Christine·2004·Pain Management Nursing

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate for gender differences in the experience of chronic pain and the impact of chronic pain on quality of life (QOL). A total of 1,912 out of 4,000 Norwegian citizens returned a mailed questionnaire, and 24.4% reported chronic pain. More women than men reported chronic pain, and women reported significantly higher pain intensity scores than men did. Although the duration of chronic pain was similar in women and men, women more often received treatment for their chronic pain. Men in chronic pain reported a poorer QOL than women did. Although specific variables that predicted present pain intensity in women and men differed, the variables that explained the largest percentage of the variance in pain for both genders were the disease and the pain location variables. These findings support previously published studies that document gender differences in chronic pain and extend the work to the impact of chronic pain on QOL.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pmn.2004.01.004

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rustøen, T., Wahl, A. K., Hanestad, B. R., Lerdal, A., Paul, S., & Miaskowski, C.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Bergen (NO)
  • Buskerud University College (NO)
Corresponding author
Rustøen, Tone
Venue
Pain Management Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-09
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
105-117
ISSN
1524-9042 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042148012
Cited by
137
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain Management Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
chronic pain, gender differences, quality of life, pain intensity, women, pain management, pain localization, disease factors, predictors of pain
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Norway, Pain, Quality of Life, Regression Analysis, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Sex Distribution, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review