The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stochastic dynamics as a principle of brain function
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neural correlates of decision variables in parietal cortex
Platt, M. L., & Glimcher, P. W. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/22268 · Cited by 1,721
Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: Expectation and prediction.
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1981) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.2.135 · Cited by 1,450
Synaptic basis of cortical persistent activity: the importance of NMDA receptors to working memory
Wang, X.-J. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-21-09587.1999 · Cited by 859
Neural computation of log likelihood in control of saccadic eye movements
Carpenter, R. H. S., & Williams, M. L. L. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/377059a0 · Cited by 823
Neuronal correlates of parametric working memory in the prefrontal cortex
Romo, R., Brody, C. D., Hernández, A., & Lemus, L. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/20939 · Cited by 822
Self-citationMotion perception: seeing and deciding.
Shadlen, M. N., & Newsome, W. T. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.2.628 · Cited by 723
Decision-making with multiple alternatives
Churchland, A. K., Kiani, R., & Shadlen, M. N. (2008) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2123 · Cited by 671
Brunel, N., & Wang, X.-J. (2001) · Journal of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1023/a:1011204814320 · Cited by 620
Bridging emotion theory and neurobiology through dynamic systems modeling
Lewis, M. D. (2005) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x0500004x · Cited by 618
A computational theory of hippocampal function, and empirical tests of the theory
Rolls, E. T., & Kesner, R. P. (2006) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2006.04.005 · Cited by 608
Self-citation
Cited by
Neurophysiological and Computational Principles of Cortical Rhythms in Cognition
Wang, X.-J. (2010) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00035.2008 · Cited by 1,939
Carhart-Harris, R. L., Leech, R., Hellyer, P. J., Shanahan, M., Feilding, A., Tagliazucchi, E., Chialvo, D. R., & Nutt, D. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00020 · Cited by 1,252
Neuronal Reward and Decision Signals: From Theories to Data
Schultz, W. (2015) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00023.2014 · Cited by 1,126
The cingulate cortex and limbic systems for emotion, action, and memory
Rolls, E. T. (2019) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-019-01945-2 · Cited by 859
Self-citationValue, pleasure and choice in the ventral prefrontal cortex
Grabenhorst, F., & Rolls, E. T. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.12.004 · Cited by 766
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Deco, G., Rolls, E. T., & Romo, R.
- Venue
- Progress in Neurobiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-16
- ISSN
- 0301-0082 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035482871
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 9.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stochastic dynamics as a principle of brain function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2009.01.006
- The paper
- Deco, G., Rolls, E. T., & Romo, R. (2009). Stochastic dynamics as a principle of brain function. Progress in Neurobiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2009.01.006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
