Cited by 34Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Emotion regulation related neural predictors of cognitive behavioral therapy response in social anxiety disorder

Open access
Klumpp, Heide, Roberts, Julia, Kennedy, Amy E., Shankman, Stewart A., Langenecker, Scott A., Gross, James J., Phan, K. Luan·2017·Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is characterized by aberrant prefrontal activity during reappraisal, an adaptive cognitive approach aimed at downregulating the automatic response evoked by a negative event. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is first-line psychotherapy for SAD, however, many remain symptomatic after treatment indicating baseline individual differences in neurofunctional activity may factor into CBT outcome. An emotion regulation strategy practiced in CBT is cognitive restructuring, a proxy for reappraisal. Therefore, neural response during reappraisal may serve as a brain-based predictor of CBT success. Prior to 12weeks of individual CBT, 34 patients with SAD completed a validated emotion regulation task during fMRI. Task instructions included 'Reappraise,' that is, use a cognitive approach to reduce affective state to a negative image, which was contrasted with looking at a negative image ('Look'). Regression results for Reappraise (vs. Look) revealed greater reduction in symptom severity was predicted by less pre-CBT activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC). Regarding predictive validity, DLPFC significantly classified responder status. Post-hoc analysis revealed DLPFC activity, but not demographic data, baseline clinical measures, or reappraisal-related affective state during fMRI, significantly accounted for the variance in symptom reduction. Findings indicate patients with SAD are more likely to benefit from CBT if there is less pre-treatment DLPFC recruitment, a region strongly implicated in emotion regulation. Patients with reduced baseline frontal activation when reappraising negative stimuli may be especially helped by explicit cognitive interventions. Further research is necessary to establish DLPFC as a stable brain-based marker of treatment outcome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.01.010

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • fMRI studies of pretreatment brain predictors have reported that lesser rostral anterior cingulate cortex and lesser left DLPFC activity during reappraisal of negative images, inverse connectivity between amygdala and right VLPFC during affect labeling, greater occipitotemporal activation to angry vs neutral faces, and dorsal ACC activation during self-referential criticism are associated with响应

    “fMRI studies of pretreatment brain predictors have reported that lesser rostral anterior cingulate cortex and lesser left DLPFC activity during reappraisal of negative images, 42,43 inverse connectivity between amygdala and right VLPFC during affect labeling, 44 greater occipitotemporal activation to angry vs neutral faces, 45 and dorsal ACC activation 46 during self-referential criticism are”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Ball TM, Stein MB, Ramsawh HJ, Campbell-Sills L, Paulus MP, 2014. Single-subject anxiety treatment outcome prediction using functional neuroimaging. Neuropsychopharmacology 39, 1254– 1261. 24270731 PMC3957121
  2. Bandelow B, Baldwin DS, Dolberg OT, Andersen HF, Stein DJ, 2006. What is the threshold for symptomatic response and remission for major depressive disorder, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder? J. Clin. Psychiatry 67, 1428– 1434. 17017830
  3. Cox RW, 1996. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput. Biomed. Res 29, 162– 173. 8812068
  4. Doehrmann O, Ghosh SS, Polli FE, Reynolds GO, Horn F, Keshavan A, Triantafyllou C, Saygin ZM, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Hofmann SG, Pollack M, Gabrieli JD, 2013. Predicting treatment response in social anxiety disorder from functional magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA Psychiatry 70, 87– 97. 22945462 PMC3844518
  5. Etkin A, Wager TD, 2007. Functional neuroimaging of anxiety: a meta-analysis of emotional processing in PTSD, social anxiety disorder, and specific phobia. Am. J. Psychiatry 164, 1476– 1488. 17898336 PMC3318959
  6. First M, Spitzer R, Gibbon M, Williams J, 1995. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders. Patient Edition (SCID-P), Version 2. Biometrics Research, New York, NY.
  7. Fu CHY, Williams SCR, Cleare AJ, Scott J, Mitterschiffthaler MT, Walsh ND, Donaldson C, Suckling J, Andrew C, Steiner H, Murray RM, 2008. Neural responses to sad facial expressions in major depression following cognitive behavioral therapy. Biol. Psychiatry 64, 505– 512. 18550030
  8. Goldin P, Manber T, Hakimi S, Canli T, Gross JJ, 2009b. Neural bases of social anxiety disorder: emotional reactivity and cognitive regulation during social and physical threat. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 66, 170– 180. 19188539 PMC4142809
  9. Hamilton M, 1960. A rating scale for depression. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 23, 56– 62. 14399272 PMC495331
  10. Heimberg RG, Hofmann SG, Liebowitz MR, Schneier FR, Smits JAJ, Stein MB, Hinton DE, Craske MG, 2014. Social anxiety disorder in DSM-5. Depress. Anxiety 31, 472– 479. 24395386
  11. Hofmann SG, 2004. Cognitive mediation of treatment change in social phobia. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol 72, 393– 399. PMC1475946 15279523
  12. Hope DA, Heimberg RG, Turk CL, 2006. Managing Social Anxiety: A Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy Approach first ed. Oxford University Press, New York, USA.
  13. Hoyer J, Wiltink J, Hiller W, Miller R, Salzer S, Sarnowsky S, Stangier U, Strauss B, Willutzki U, Leibing E, 2016. Baseline patient characteristics predicting outcome and attrition in cognitive therapy for social phobia: results from a large multicentre trial: predictors of outcome in social phobia. Clin. Psychol. Psychother 23, 35– 46. 25504802
  14. Jakubovski E, Bloch MH, 2014. Prognostic subgroups for citalopram response in the STAR*D trial. J. Clin. Psychiatry 75, 738– 747. 24912106 PMC4471174
  15. Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, Merikangas KR, Walters EE, 2005. Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 62, 617– 627. 15939839 PMC2847357
  16. Klumpp H, Fitzgerald DA, Phan KL, 2013. Neural predictors and mechanisms of cognitive behavioral therapy on threat processing in social anxiety disorder. Prog. NeuroPsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 45, 83– 91. 23665375 PMC3951971
  17. Klumpp H, Fitzgerald DA, Angstadt M, Post D, Phan KL, 2014. Neural response during attentional control and emotion processing predicts improvement after cognitive behavioral therapy in generalized social anxiety disorder. Psychol. Med 44, 3109– 3121. 25066308 PMC4376309
  18. Klumpp H, Fitzgerald DA, Piejko K, Roberts J, Kennedy AE, Phan KL, 2016. Prefrontal control and predictors of cognitive behavioral therapy response in social anxiety disorder. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci 11, 630– 640. 26634281 PMC4814792
  19. Ledley DR, Huppert JD, Foa EB, Davidson JRT, Keefe FJ, Potts NLS, 2005. Impact of depressive symptoms on the treatment of generalized social anxiety disorder. Depress. Anxiety 22, 161– 167. 16175565
  20. Liebowitz MR, 1987. Social phobia. Mod. Probl. Pharmacopsychiatry 22, 141– 173. 2885745
  21. Loerinc AG, Meuret AE, Twohig MP, Rosenfield D, Bluett EJ, Craske MG, 2015. Response rates for CBT for anxiety disorders: need for standardized criteria. Clin. Psychol. Rev 42, 72– 82. 26319194
  22. MacNamara A, Rabinak CA, Kennedy AE, Fitzgerald DA, Liberzon I, Stein MB, Phan KL, 2016. Emotion regulatory brain function and SSRI treatment in PTSD: neural correlates and predictors of change. Neuropsychopharmacology 41, 611– 618. 26111649 PMC5130136
  23. Månsson KNT, Frick A, Boraxbekk C-J, Marquand AF, Williams SCR, Carlbring P, Andersson G, Furmark T, 2015. Predicting long-term outcome of internet-delivered cognitive behavior therapy for social anxiety disorder using fMRI and support vector machine learning. Transl. Psychiatry 5, e530. 25781229 PMC4354352
  24. Messina I, Bianco S, Sambin M, Viviani R, 2015. Executive and semantic processes in reappraisal of negative stimuli: insights from a meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Front. Psychol 6. PMC4499672 26217277
  25. Miller EK, Cohen JD, 2001. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu. Rev. Neurosci 24, 167– 202. 11283309
  26. Mululo SCC, de Menezes GB, Vigne P, Fontenelle LF, 2012. A review on predictors of treatment outcome in social anxiety disorder. Rev. Bras. Psiquiatr 34, 92– 100 Sao Paulo Brazil. 1999. 22392395
  27. Ochsner KN, Gross JJ, 2005. The cognitive control of emotion. Trends Cogn. Sci 9, 242– 249. 15866151
  28. Ochsner KN, Bunge SA, Gross JJ, Gabrieli JDE, 2002. Rethinking feelings: an fMRI study of the cognitive regulation of emotion. J. Cogn. Neurosci 14, 1215– 1229. 12495527
  29. Phan KL, Fitzgerald DA, Nathan PJ, Moore GJ, Uhde TW, Tancer ME, 2005. Neural substrates for voluntary suppression of negative affect: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Biol. Psychiatry 57, 210– 219. 15691521
  30. Rabinak CA, MacNamara A, Kennedy AE, Angstadt M, Stein MB, Liberzon I, Phan KL, 2014. Focal and aberrant prefrontal engagement during emotion regulation in veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Depress. Anxiety 31, 851– 861. 24677490 PMC4141895
  31. Spielberger CD, 1983. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y). Consulting Psychologists Press.
  32. Spokas M, Luterek JA, Heimberg RG, 2009. Social anxiety and emotional suppression: the mediating role of beliefs. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 40, 283– 291. 19135648
  33. Thompson DG, Kesler SR, Sudheimer K, Mehta KM, Thompson LW, Marquett RM, Holland JM, Reiser R, Rasgon N, Schatzberg A, O’Hara RM, 2015. FMRI activation during executive function predicts response to cognitive behavioral therapy in older, depressed adults. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 23, 13– 22. 24656506 PMC8040025
  34. van Vliet IM, den Boer JA, Westenberg HG, 1994. Psychopharmacological treatment of social phobia; a double blind placebo controlled study with fluvoxamine. Psychopharmacology 115, 128– 134. 7862884
  35. Yang Y, Kircher T, Straube B, 2014. The neural correlates of cognitive behavioral therapy: recent progress in the investigation of patients with panic disorder. Behav. Res. Ther 62, 88– 96. 25124776
  36. Zilverstand A, Parvaz MA, Goldstein RZ, 2016. Neuroimaging cognitive reappraisal in clinical populations to define neural targets for enhancing emotion regulation. A Systematic Review. NeuroImage 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.009 (Epub ahead of print). PMC5145785 27288319 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Zimmerman M, Martinez JH, Young D, Chelminski I, Dalrymple K, 2013. Severity classification on the Hamilton depression rating scale. J. Affect. Disord 150, 384– 388. 23759278

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klumpp, H., Roberts, J., Kennedy, A. E., Shankman, S. A., Langenecker, S. A., Gross, J. J., & Phan, K. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Klumpp, Heide
Venue
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-04
Volume
75
Pages
106-112
ISSN
0278-5846 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2581558860
Cited by
34
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4
FWCI
7.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • NIMH (K23MH093679, R01MH101497)
  • Brain & Behavior Research Foundation
  • Center for Clinical and Translational Research (UL1RR029879)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, emotion regulation, cognitive reappraisal, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, treatment response prediction, neural predictors, cognitive restructuring, symptom severity reduction, individual differences
MeSH terms
Phobia, Social, Adolescent, Adult, Brain Mapping, Emotions, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, ROC Curve, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review