Cited by 9Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFree Will and Agency

Lateralized readiness potentials and sensorimotor activity in adults with obsessive-compulsive disorder

Morand-Beaulieu, Simon, Aardema, Frederick, O'Connor, Kieron P., Lavoie, Marc E.·2021·Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients are known to have various functional abnormalities in prefrontal and motor areas. Given the presence of compulsions in many OCD patients, impaired response preparation processes could be a core feature of OCD. Yet, these processes remain understudied from a neurophysiological standpoint. Nineteen OCD patients were matched on age and sex to 19 healthy controls. Continuous EEG was recorded in all participants during a stimulus-response compatibility task. EEG from electrodes C3 and C4 was then averaged into stimulus- and response-locked LRPs. We compared both groups on various LRP measures, such as the LRP onset, the Gratton dip, and the maximum LRP peak. OCD patients showed significantly larger LRP peak than healthy controls, as well as larger Gratton dip. However, there was no group difference regarding LRP onset. Among OCD patients, it seems that motor regions are overactive during response preparation. Such overactivity was found for both incorrect responses that are aborted before execution and responses that are truly executed. These results suggest that regulation of sensorimotor activity should be addressed in the treatment of OCD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.110061

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Novel behavioural interventions such as habit augmented ERP extend beyond traditional cognitive approaches and offer promise for moving toward a personalised treatment approach, based on measurable behavioural characteristics.

    “Novel behavioural interventions such as habit augmented ERP extend beyond traditional cognitive approaches and offer promise for moving toward a personalised treatment approach, based on measurable behavioural characteristics [6,7,83,84]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morand-Beaulieu, S., Aardema, F., O'Connor, K. P., & Lavoie, M. E.
Affiliations
Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Lavoie, Marc E.
Venue
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
104
Pages
110061
ISSN
0278-5846 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3048086873
Cited by
9
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (415541, MOP84573, RCT244288)
  • Université de Montréal
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, lateralized readiness potential, sensorimotor activity, response preparation, compulsive behavior, prefrontal cortex, motor cortex
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Contingent Negative Variation, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review