Cited by 40Oceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesMarine and fisheries researchClimate variability and models

Observation-based sea surface temperature trends in Atlantic large marine ecosystems

Open access
Kessler, Augustin, Goris, Nadine, Lauvset, Siv Kari·2022·Progress in Oceanography

Abstract

Variations in Sea Surface Temperature (SST) are an important driver of marine species abundance in Large Marine Ecosystems (LMEs). Studies concerned with climate change induced SST trends within these LMEs have so far been relying on satellite data and reanalysis products, with the disadvantages of only having short time-periods available and having to rely on the ability of the models to correctly simulate SST-dynamics, respectively. Here, we provide for the first time a long-term trend analysis of SST for 17 LMEs of the Atlantic Ocean over two different time-periods (1957–2020 and 1980–2020) based on in-situ data gathered from three data collections. We sort our results according to warming categories that were established in an earlier study, i.e., “cooling” (below 0 °C/dec), “slow” (0–0.07 °C/dec), “moderate” (0.07–0.14 °C/dec), “fast” (0.14–0.21 °C/dec) and “superfast” (above 0.21 °C/dec). Our results show a persistent “slow” to “superfast” warming in all considered LMEs. However, the sparse data coverage induces large uncertainties, so that many LMEs cannot uniquely be assigned to one warming category only. We detect no systematic changes in the seasonal SST amplitude of the considered LMEs. We find that the LMEs of the North Atlantic warm faster than those of the South Atlantic and that this difference is increasing with time. Out of the North Atlantic LMEs, the Norwegian Sea, North Sea, Celtic-Biscay Shelf, Gulf of Mexico and the Northeast U.S. Continental Shelf belong exclusively to the superfast warming category for the period 1980–2020.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pocean.2022.102902

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Strong, A.E., Liu, G., Eakin, C.M., Christensen, J.D., Skirving, W., Gledhill, D.K., Heron, S.F., Morgan, J.A., 2008. Implications for our coral reefs in a changing climate over the next few decades – Hints from the past 22years. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Coral Reef Symposium, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, pp. 1130–1334.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Kessler, A., Goris, N., & Lauvset, S. K.
Venue
Progress in Oceanography
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-11
Volume
208
Pages
102902
ISSN
0079-6611 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4296690536
Cited by
40
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 6
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Progress In Oceanography (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Institutional Archive of Ifremer (French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Horizon 2020 (863034)
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
Keywords
sea surface temperature trends, large marine ecosystems, Atlantic Ocean, ocean warming, North Atlantic warming, climate change impacts on marine species, Norwegian Sea, North Sea, Gulf of Mexico, Northeast U.S. continental shelf

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review