Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stimuli-responsive hydrogels for manipulation of cell microenvironment: From chemistry to biofabrication technology

Open access
Mohamed, Mohamed Alaa, Fallahi, Afsoon, El-Sokkary, Ahmed M.A., Salehi, Sahar, Akl, Magda A., Jafari, Amin, Tamayol, Ali, Fenniri, Hicham, Khademhosseini, Ali, Andreadis, Stelios T., Cheng, Chong·2019·Progress in Polymer Science
DOI 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101147
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Native tissues orchestrate their functions by complex interdependent cascades of biochemical and biophysical cues that vary spatially and temporally during cellular processes. Scaffolds with well-tuned structural, mechanical, and biochemical properties have been developed to guide cell behavior and provide insight on cell-matrix interaction. However, static scaffolds very often fail to mimic the dynamicity of native extracellular matrices. Stimuli-responsive scaffolds have emerged as powerful platforms that capture vital features of native tissues owing to their ability to change chemical and physical properties in response to cytocompatible stimuli, thus enabling on-demand manipulation of cell microenvironment. The vast expansion in biorthogonal chemistries and stimuli-responsive functionalities has fuelled further the development of new smart scaffolds that can permit multiple irreversible or reversible spatiotemporal modulation of cell-directing cues, thereby prompting in-depth studies to interpret the decisive elements that regulate cell behavior. Integration of stimuli-responsive hydrogels with current biofabrication technologies has allowed the development of dynamic scaffolds with organizational features and hierarchical architectures similar to native tissues. This review highlights the progress achieved using stimuli-responsive hydrogels in fundamental cell biology studies, with particular emphasis on the interplay between chemistry, biomaterials design, and biofabrication technologies for manipulation of cell microenvironment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101147

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
Mohamed, M. A., Fallahi, A., El-Sokkary, A. M. A., Salehi, S., Akl, M. A., Jafari, A., Tamayol, A., Fenniri, H., Khademhosseini, A., Andreadis, S. T., & Cheng, C.
Venue
Progress in Polymer Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
98
Pages
101147
ISSN
0079-6700 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101147
OpenAlex
W2966883708
Cited by
184
References
24
FWCI
6.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stimuli-responsive hydrogels for manipulation of cell microenvironment: From chemistry to biofabrication technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101147
The paper
Mohamed, M. A., Fallahi, A., El-Sokkary, A. M. A., Salehi, S., Akl, M. A., Jafari, A., Tamayol, A., Fenniri, H., Khademhosseini, A., Andreadis, S. T., & Cheng, C. (2019). Stimuli-responsive hydrogels for manipulation of cell microenvironment: From chemistry to biofabrication technology. Progress in Polymer Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101147

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.