Cited by 86Digital Transformation in IndustryImpact of AI and Big Data on Business and SocietyApplied Advanced Technologies

Towards improving the future of manufacturing through digital twin and augmented reality technologies

Open access
Rabah, Souad, Assila, Ahlem, Khouri, Elio, Maier, Florian, Ababsa, Fakreddine, bourny, Valéry, Maier, Paul, Mérienne, Frédéric·2018·Procedia Manufacturing

Abstract

We are on the cusp of a technological revolution that will fundamentally change our relationships to others and the way we live and work. These changes, in their importance, scope, and complexity, is different than what humanity has known until now. We do not yet know what will happen, but one thing is certain: our response must be comprehensive and it must involve all stakeholders at the global level: the public sector, the private sector, the academic world and civil society. Applications for the industrial sector are already numerous: predictive maintenance, improved decision-making in real time, anticipation of stocks according to the progress of production, etc. So many improvements that optimize the production tools every day a little more, and point to possibilities for the future of Industry 4.0, the crossroads of an interconnected global world. This work comes to contribute as a part of this industrial evolution(Usine 4.0). In this paper we introduce a part of a collaboration between industry and research area in order to develop a DT and AR industrial solution as a part of a predictive maintenance framework. In this context, we elaborate a proof-of-concept that was developed in special industrial application.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.10.070

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Seven articles in Table 1 developed ad-hoc systems to build DT.

    “In Table 1 seven articles developed ' ad-hoc ' systems to build DT: for the management of a didactic production line [26], to construct a MES in Android systems [43], to build user guides for safety reason [60,62], and to evaluate the performances of a cloud-based DT [74,75];”

    From Review of digital twin applications in manufacturing (2019) · cites this paper as [60]

    Section 4.2.1 (page unavailable) describes an ad-hoc augmented-reality application with configuration and maintenance guidance modules, and Section 4.1 describes the paper’s digital-twin proof of concept. The cited paper therefore fits as an example of a purpose-built system, but our copy does not say that its guides were built for safety reasons or that the guidance application was already integrated with the digital twin. The count of seven articles is the citing paper’s own Table 1 summary, not a finding attributed to this individual source. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hugues, O., 2011. Réalité augmentée pour l'aide à la navigation. SIGMA: Système d'information Géographique Maritime Augmentée. Ph.D. thesis. Université Sciences et Technologies-Bordeaux I.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rabah, S., Assila, A., Khouri, E., Maier, F., Ababsa, F., bourny, V., Maier, P., & Mérienne, F.
Affiliations
  • UniLaSalle Amiens (ESIEE-Amiens) (FR)
  • Centre d'Etudes Superieures Industrielles (FR)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Études-Recherches-Matériaux (France) (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Rabah, Souad
  • Assila, Ahlem
Venue
Procedia Manufacturing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018
Volume
17
Issue
Special issue on 28th International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing
Pages
460-467
ISSN
2351-9789 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2901498066
Cited by
86
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Procedia Manufacturing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • SAM, the Arts et Métiers ParisTech open access repository (Paris Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Impact of AI and Big Data on Business and Society
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Applied Advanced Technologies
Keywords
digital twin, augmented reality, Industry 4.0, predictive maintenance, manufacturing industry, industry-research collaboration, proof of concept, real-time decision making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review