Cited by 160Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Neural correlates of attachment trauma in borderline personality disorder: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study

Buchheim, Anna, Erk, Susanne, George, Carol, Kächele, Horst, Kircher, Tilo, Martius, Philipp, Pokorny, Dan, Ruchsow, Martin +2 more·2008·Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging

Abstract

Functional imaging studies have shown that individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD) display prefrontal and amygdala dysfunction while viewing or listening to emotional or traumatic stimuli. The study examined for the first time the functional neuroanatomy of attachment trauma in BPD patients using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during the telling of individual stories. A group of 11 female BPD patients and 17 healthy female controls, matched for age and education, told stories in response to a validated set of seven attachment pictures while being scanned. Group differences in narrative and neural responses to "monadic" pictures (characters facing attachment threats alone) and "dyadic" pictures (interaction between characters in an attachment context) were analyzed. Behavioral narrative data showed that monadic pictures were significantly more traumatic for BPD patients than for controls. As hypothesized BPD patients showed significantly more anterior midcingulate cortex activation in response to monadic pictures than controls. In response to dyadic pictures patients showed more activation of the right superior temporal sulcus and less activation of the right parahippocampal gyrus compared to controls. Our results suggest evidence for potential neural mechanisms of attachment trauma underlying interpersonal symptoms of BPD, i.e. fearful and painful intolerance of aloneness, hypersensitivity to social environment, and reduced positive memories of dyadic interactions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2007.07.001

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with borderline personality showed significantly more anterior midcingulate cortex activation compared with controls in response to separation stimuli.

    “In a follow-up study (Buchheim et al., 2008), a similar paradigm showed that patients with borderline personality, a disorder of emotional instability connected with early-life trauma, showed significantly more anterior midcingulate cortex activation compared with controls in response to separation stimuli.”

    From The human parental brain: In vivo neuroimaging (2011) · cites this paper as Buchheim et al., 2008

  • In response to dyadic pro-attachment stimuli, borderline patients showed more activation of the right superior temporal sulcus and less activation of the right parahippocampal gyrus compared to controls.

    “In response to dyadic (pro-attachment) stimuli, patients showed more activation of the right superior temporal sulcus and less activation of the right parahippocampal gyrus compared to controls.”

    From The human parental brain: In vivo neuroimaging (2011) · cites this paper as Buchheim et al., 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buchheim, A., Erk, S., George, C., Kächele, H., Kircher, T., Martius, P., Pokorny, D., Ruchsow, M., Spitzer, M., & Walter, H.
Affiliations
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • University of Bonn (DE)
  • Mills College (US)
  • RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Venue
Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-08
Volume
163
Issue
3
Pages
223-235
ISSN
0925-4927 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041714345
Cited by
160
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
8.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Universität Ulm
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
borderline personality disorder, attachment trauma, narrative processing, anterior midcingulate cortex, superior temporal sulcus, parahippocampal gyrus, interpersonal sensitivity
MeSH terms
Adult, Amygdala, Borderline Personality Disorder, Brain, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Life Change Events, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Object Attachment, Temporal Lobe, Parahippocampal Gyrus, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review