Cited by 285Attachment and Relationship DynamicsNeuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Neuroscience of human social interactions and adult attachment style

Open access
Vrtička, Pascal, Vuilleumier, Patrik·2012·Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Abstract

Since its first description four decades ago, attachment theory (AT) has become one of the principal developmental psychological frameworks for describing the role of individual differences in the establishment and maintenance of social bonds between people. Yet, still little is known about the neurobiological underpinnings of attachment orientations and their well-established impact on a range of social and affective behaviors. In the present review, we summarize data from recent studies using cognitive and imaging approaches to characterize attachment styles and their effect on emotion and social cognition. We propose a functional neuroanatomical framework to integrate the key brain mechanisms involved in the perception and regulation of social emotional information, and their modulation by individual differences in terms of secure versus insecure (more specifically avoidant, anxious, or resolved versus unresolved) attachment traits. This framework describes how each individual's attachment style (built through interactions between personal relationship history and predispositions) may influence the encoding of approach versus aversion tendencies (safety versus threat) in social encounters, implicating the activation of a network of subcortical (amygdala, hippocampus, striatum) and cortical (insula, cingulate) limbic areas. These basic and automatic affective evaluation mechanisms are in turn modulated by more elaborate and voluntary cognitive control processes, subserving mental state attribution and emotion regulation capacities, implicating a distinct network in medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), superior temporal sulcus (STS), and temporo-parietal junction (TPJ), among others. Recent neuroimaging data suggest that affective evaluation is decreased in avoidantly but increased in anxiously attached individuals. In turn, although data on cognitive control is still scarce, it points toward a possible enhancement of mental state representations associated with attachment insecurity and particularly anxiety. Emotion regulation strategies such as reappraisal or suppression of social emotions are also differentially modulated by attachment style. This research does not only help better understand the neural underpinnings of human social behavior, but also provides important insights on psychopathological conditions where attachment dysregulation is likely to play an important (causal) role.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00212

Cites

112 of 112 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children with disorganized attachment exhibit incoherent and contradictory reactions, alternating between proximity seeking, fear, and avoidance of the caregiver.

    “Finally, children with disorganized attachment exhibit incoherent and contradictory reactions, alternating between proximity seeking behaviors, manifestations of fear, and avoidance of the caregiver (Vrtička & Vuilleumier, 2012).”

    From The Role of Personality in Language Learning (2026) · cites this paper as Vrtička & Vuilleumier, 2012

    The Attachment theory section describes disorganized attachment as involving both avoidant and anxious traits or disoriented behavior lacking a coherent attachment strategy. It does not specifically describe children alternating between proximity seeking, fear, and avoidance of a caregiver; those details go beyond what this copy says. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

10 of the 122 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Decety J. Michalska K. J. Akitsuki Y. Lahey B. B. (2009). Atypical empathic responses in adolescents with aggressive conduct disorder: a functional MRI investigation. Biol. Psychol. 80, 203– 211 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.09.004 18940230 PMC2819310 · DOI
  2. Fisher H. E. Aron A. Brown L. L. (2006). Romantic love: a mammalian brain system for mate choice. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 361, 2173– 2186 10.1098/rstb.2006.1938 17118931 PMC1764845 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Mikulincer M. Shaver P. R. (2007). Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change. New York, NY: The Guilford Press
  4. Porges S. W. (2003). Social engagement and attachment - a phylogenetic perspective. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1008, 31– 47 10.1196/annals.1301.004 14998870 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vrtička, P., & Vuilleumier, P.
Affiliations
University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Vrtička, Pascal
Venue
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2012
Volume
6
Pages
212-212
ISSN
1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040047870
Cited by
285
References
122
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 1
FWCI
21.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (51NF40-104897)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (104897, 51NF40)
  • Université de Genève (51NF40-104897)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
attachment styles, attachment theory, insecure attachment, attachment anxiety, attachment avoidance, social-emotional processing, limbic system, amygdala, hippocampus, insula, medial prefrontal cortex, superior temporal sulcus, temporoparietal junction, cognitive control, mental state attribution, emotion regulation, cognitive reappraisal, emotional suppression, social behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review