Cited by 148Sexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyImpact of Technology on AdolescentsGender, Feminism, and Media

Sexting among Spanish adolescents: Prevalence and personality profiles

Open access
Gámez-Guadix, Manuel, de Santisteban, Patricia, Resett, Santiago·2017·Psicothema

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Voluntarily sending sexual content (e.g., photos, videos) among adolescents via the Internet and mobile phones, a phenomenon called sexting , is receiving increasing social and research attention. The aims of this study were: 1) to analyze the prevalence and trends of sexting among adolescents by gender and age and 2) to examine the personality profile of adolescents that participated in sexting. METHOD: The sample consisted of 3,223 Spanish adolescents from 12 to 17 years of age (49.9% female; mean age = 14.06, SD = 1.37) who anonymously and voluntarily completed self-report questionnaires on sexting and the big five personality factors. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of sexting was 13.5%. The prevalence was 3.4% at 12 years old and increased to 36.1% at 17 years of age, showing a growing and significant linear trend. Overall, no differences were found between males and females. The personality profile of those involved in sexting was characterized by higher Extraversion and Neuroticism and by lower scores in Conscientiousness and Agreeableness. CONCLUSIONS: Given its high prevalence, beyond adopting a perspective based on the dangers of sexting, an educational approach that emphasizes responsible and informed use of information and communication technologies is necessary.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7334/psicothema2016.222

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gámez-Guadix, M., de Santisteban, P., & Resett, S.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  • Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos (AR)
Venue
Psicothema
Published
2017-02-01
Volume
1
Issue
29
Pages
29-34
ISSN
  • 0214-9915 (ISSN-L)
  • 1886-144X
OpenAlex
W2625867650
Cited by
148
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7
FWCI
17.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psicothema (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Banco Santander
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (grant PSI2012-31550, PSI2012-31550)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
Keywords
sexting, adolescents, prevalence, Big Five personality traits, personality profiles, age differences, gender differences, Spanish adolescents, online sexual content
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Psychology, Adolescent, Age Factors, Child, Child Behavior, Psychology, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Personality, Sexual Behavior, Prevalence, Internet, Cell Phone, Text Messaging, Social Networking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review