Cited by 55Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Effect of anxiety on treatment presentation and outcome: Results from the marijuana treatment project

Open access
Buckner, Julia D., Carroll, Kathleen M.·2010·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Despite emerging evidence of the efficacy of psychotherapies for marijuana dependence, variability in outcome exists. This study examined the role of anxiety on treatment involvement and outcome. Four questions were examined: (1) Is greater anxiety associated with greater impairment at baseline? (2) Is baseline anxiety related to greater marijuana use and problems following treatment? (3) Does adding cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) to motivation enhancement therapy (MET) reduce anxiety relative to MET alone; (4) Are reductions in anxiety associated with better outcomes? The sample comprised 450 marijuana-dependent patients in the Marijuana Treatment Project. Marijuana use and anxiety were measured at pretreatment and 4- and 9-month follow-ups. At baseline, anxiety was linked to more marijuana-related problems. CBT was associated with less anxiety at follow-up compared to MET alone. Reductions in anxiety were related to less marijuana use. In fact, reduction in anxiety from baseline to 4-month follow-up was associated with less marijuana use at 9 months, but reduction in marijuana use did not predict subsequent anxiety. Data suggest that anxiety is an important variable that deserves further attention in marijuana-dependence treatment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.10.010

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with elevated anxiety have poorer cannabis outcomes after MET-CBT, including more cannabis use and related problems.

    “patients with elevated anxiety report more cannabis use and related problems following treatment (Buckner & Carroll, 2010).”

    From Integrated cognitive behavioral therapy for comorbid cannabis use and anxiety disorders: A pilot randomized controlled trial (2019) · cites this paper as Buckner & Carroll, 2010

    The Results (§3.2; page unavailable) link higher pretreatment anxiety to more cannabis-related problems at follow-up among women, but not men. Results (§3.4) link changes in anxiety to later cannabis use and problems, including in the CBT-MET condition. The claim overstates these findings by treating elevated anxiety as a general predictor of both greater use and more problems after CBT-MET. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Reductions in anxiety during cannabis use disorder treatment are associated with better outcomes.

    “decreases in anxiety during CUD treatment are related to better outcomes (Buckner & Carroll, 2010)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JB Structured Clinical Interview for Axis I DSM-IV Disorders - Patient Edition (SCID-I/P, Version 2.0) Biometrics Research Department 1994 New York New York State Psychiatric Institute

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buckner, J. D., & Carroll, K. M.
Affiliations
  • Louisiana State University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Buckner, Julia D.
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
178
Issue
3
Pages
493-500
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072755299
Cited by
55
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Civil War Book Review (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K05-DA00457, F31DA021457, R25DA020515, R37DA015969, P50DA009241, K05DA000457, R01DA015969, P50-DA-0-9241)
  • Center for Substance Abuse Treatment
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
cannabis use disorder, anxiety, treatment outcomes, treatment engagement, cognitive behavioral therapy, cannabis use, substance use disorders
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Marijuana Abuse, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Statistics as Topic, Time Factors, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Chi-Square Distribution, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review