CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 606Mental Health Treatment and AccessHealth Education and ValidationPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS): A new scale-based measure of mental health literacy

Open access
O’Connor, Matt, Casey, Leanne·2015·Psychiatry Research
DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.05.064
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Although Mental Health Literacy (MHL) has been a topic of substantial interest, measurement of this concept using a scale-based measure has been limited, including a lack of psychometric and methodologically robust scale-based measures of MHL. This study developed a new scale-based measure of MHL, the Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS), which assesses all attributes of MHL. Construction of the MHLS was done over three key stages, including measure development, pilot testing and assessment of psychometrics and methodological quality. The resulting measure is a 35 item, univariate scale that is easily administered and scored. Results showed significant differences in scores between mental health professionals and a community sample, as well as individuals with greater experience with mental health, and a significant positive relationship with help-seeking intentions. The MHLS also demonstrated good internal and test-retest reliability. Evaluation of the methodological quality of the MHLS indicated that it has substantial methodological advantages in comparison to existing scale-based measures of MHL. The MHLS can be used in assessing individual and population level differences in MHL and in determining the impact of programmes designed to improve MHL.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.05.064

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. American Psychiatric Association, 2000. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV-TR (fourth ed.), Washington, DC.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 606

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
O’Connor, M., & Casey, L.
Affiliations
Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
O’Connor, Matt
ORCID
O’Connor, Matt
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
229
Issue
1-2
Pages
511-516
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.psychres.2015.05.064
OpenAlex
W1850933954
Cited by
605
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 82 · 2025: 121 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3
FWCI
15.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Health Education and Validation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
mental health literacy, Mental Health Literacy Scale, scale development, psychometric properties, help-seeking intentions, mental health professionals, community sample, internal consistency, test-retest reliability
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cholestyramine Resin, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult, Health Literacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review