Cited by 20Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychiatric care and mental health services

Efficacy and feasibility of the Integrated Psychological Therapy for outpatients with schizophrenia in Greece: Final results of a RCT

Rakitzi, Stavroula, Georgila, Polyxeni, Efthimiou, Konstantinos, Mueller, Daniel R.·2016·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and the feasibility of cognitive remediation group therapy in patients with schizophrenia in Greece. For this purpose, the cognitive part of the Integrated Psychological Therapy (IPT), focusing on neuro- and social cognition, was compared in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) with treatment as usual (TAU). 48 outpatients took part in the study. IPT groups received 20 biweekly 1-h-therapy sessions. A test-battery was assessed at baseline, after therapy, and at a 3-month follow-up. Regarding cognitive functioning, significant effects favouring IPT were found in working memory and social perception during therapy and at follow-up. No effects could be found in verbal memory and vigilance. Significant effects favoring IPT were found in negative symptoms, in insight and in general symptoms during therapy and at follow-up using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). No effects were evident in positive symptoms and in psychosocial functioning. Significant effects favoring TAU were found in the quality of life assessment at follow-up. The study supports evidence for the feasibility and efficacy of IPT in psychiatric care in Greece and it hopefully will initiate the broader use of evidenced-based treatments like IPT in Greek Psychiatry.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.05.039

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rakitzi, S., Georgila, P., Efthimiou, K., & Mueller, D. R.
Affiliations
  • General Hospital of Athens G. Genimatas (GR)
  • University Hospital of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
Rakitzi, Stavroula
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
242
Pages
137-143
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2409285185
Cited by
20
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
integrated psychological therapy, schizophrenia, cognitive remediation, group therapy, working memory, social perception, negative symptoms, insight, quality of life, outpatients, treatment efficacy, feasibility, Greece
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition, Feasibility Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Greece, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Psychotherapy, Group, Quality of Life, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review