Cited by 59Tryptophan and brain disordersTreatment of Major DepressionStress Responses and Cortisol

Role of IL-8, CRP and epidermal growth factor in depression and anxiety patients treated with mindfulness-based therapy or cognitive behavioral therapy in primary health care

Memon, Ashfaque A., Sundquist, Kristina, Ahmad, Abrar, Wang, Xiao, Hedelius, Anna, Sundquist, Jan·2017·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Epidermal growth factor (EGF) and inflammatory markers have been associated with various neuro-psychiatric disorders. However, their role in mild to moderate depression and anxiety patients treated with mindfulness-based group therapy (mindfulness) or cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is not known. In this study we analyzed plasma levels of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and EGF before (baseline) and after treatment (8 weeks) and investigated their role in response to both arms of the treatment. To cover variety of mental symptoms, treatment response was analyzed by four scales, the Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scale (MADRS), Hospital anxiety and depression scale- Depression (HADS-D) and anxiety (HADS-A) and patients health questionnaire-9. EGF levels were significantly decreased after both mindfulness and CBT and were associated with treatment response on all scales independent of the use of tranquilizers and antidepressant treatment. Moreover, baseline EGF levels were significantly associated only with baseline scores of anxiety scale. Levels of inflammatory markers analyzed in this study, were not significantly associated with treatment response on any scale. Our findings suggest that improvement in symptoms of depression and anxiety after both mindfulness and CBT is associated with changes in EGF levels but not with the inflammatory markers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.05.012

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Memon, A. A., Sundquist, K., Ahmad, A., Wang, X., Hedelius, A., & Sundquist, J.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Memon, Ashfaque A.
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
254
Pages
311-316
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2613560536
Cited by
59
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Region Skåne
  • Australian Liver Foundation
  • Vetenskapsrådet (K2012-70X-15428-08-3)
  • Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd (2013-1836)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
interleukin-8, C-reactive protein, epidermal growth factor, depression, anxiety, mindfulness-based interventions, cognitive behavioral therapy, inflammatory markers, treatment response, primary care, plasma biomarkers
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, C-Reactive Protein, Depression, Epidermal Growth Factor, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Psychotherapy, Group, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Interleukin-8, Young Adult, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review