Cited by 427COVID-19 and Mental HealthHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutOccupational Health and Burnout

Psychological effects of the COVID-2019 pandemic: Perceived stress and coping strategies among healthcare professionals.

Open access
Babore, Alessandra, Lombardi, Lucia, Viceconti, Maria Luisa, Pignataro, Silvia, Marino, Valentina, Crudele, Monia, Candelori, Carla, Bramanti, Sonia Monique +1 more·2020·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Starting from China, the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) contagion spread unexpectedly and quickly all over the world, particularly affecting Italy. In the early stages of the epidemic, healthcare professionals have been in the front-line to manage the infection. The current study aimed to analyse the impact of COVID-19 outbreak on healthcare professionals and to detect some risk and protective factors of their distress levels, with regard to socio-demographic variables, direct exposure to COVID-19 and the coping strategies used to deal with stress. The data were collected during the peak of the infection. A total of 595 healthcare professionals enrolled in the study and completed the measures of socio-demographical and professional data, perceived stress (PSS) and coping strategies (COPE- NVI-25). Overall, we found that a positive attitude towards the stressful situation was the main protective factor, while female gender, seeking social support, avoidance strategies and working with COVID-19 patients were risk factors. Economic status, problem solving ability and turning to religion were not associated with stress levels. This study, one of the first on this topic, highlighted the main coping strategies used by healthcare professionals in facing the highly stressful situation caused by the pandemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113366

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Istituto Superiore di Sanità L'epidemiologia per la sanità pubblica, aggiornamenti sul coronavirus [Epidemiology for public health, updates on coronavirus] 2020, 04, 27 Retrieved from https://www.epicentro.iss.it/coronavirus/aggiornamenti
  2. Protezione civile Dipartimento della Protezione Civile, sezione comunicati stampa [Department of Civil Protection, press releases section] 2020, 04, 27 Retrieved from http://www.protezionecivile.gov.it/web/guest/media-comunicazione/comunicati-stampa

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Babore, A., Lombardi, L., Viceconti, M. L., Pignataro, S., Marino, V., Crudele, M., Candelori, C., Bramanti, S. M., & Trumello, C.
Affiliations
University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
Corresponding author
Trumello, Carmen
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
293
Pages
113366
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3046652265
Cited by
427
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 96 · 2022: 120 · 2021: 118 · 2020: 11
FWCI
34.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers, perceived stress, coping strategies, psychological distress, risk and protective factors, social support, avoidance coping, frontline workers, gender differences
MeSH terms
Occupational Stress, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Social Support, Socioeconomic Factors, Workplace, Young Adult, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review