Cited by 41COVID-19 and Mental HealthStudent Stress and CopingHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnout

Perceived stress among university students in south-east Serbia during the COVID-19 outbreak

Open access
Kostić, Jelena, Žikić, Olivera, Đorđević, Vladimir, Krivokapić, Žilijeta·2021·Annals of General Psychiatry

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has brought into focus the mental health of the student population. The study aimed to analyze the psychological response to the COVID-19 outbreak in terms of perceived stress and its related factors among university students in south-east Serbia. The study was conducted during the increased incidence of COVID-19 in Serbia. METHOD: A total of 434 students from the public university in south-east Serbia enrolled in the study and completed the measures of socio-demographic data, the perceived stress scale (PSS-10), the Coping Strategy Indicator (CSI) and the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28). The data were analyzed through quantitative and qualitative methods. RESULTS: Study findings suggest that the mean perceived stress score was placed to 20.43 (± 7.67). Our model showed that female gender, higher scores on anxiety/insomnia and depression subscale as well as the coping strategy avoidance predicted higher perceived stress, while higher scores on social dysfunction were related to the reduced perceived stress scores. CONCLUSION: Notwithstanding the study limitation, findings provided authentic data of stress reactions of the students in south-east Serbia during the COVID-19 outbreak. The findings confirm the need to examine students' experiences in emergencies and crises, as well as to make a plan for online stress management programs that would help alleviate stress during a global pandemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12991-021-00346-2

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At the onset of the pandemic, 64.5% of students reported symptoms of depression, 66.8% severe levels of anxiety, and 66.7% extremely severe symptoms of stress (24).

    “at the onset of the pandemic, 64.5% of students reported the symptoms of depression, 66.8% severe levels of anxiety, and 66.7% extremely severe symptoms of stress (24).”

    From Mental health status and coping strategies during COVID-19 pandemic among university students in Central Serbia (2023) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Results (page unavailable) describe the students’ average perceived stress as moderate, rather than extremely severe; the Discussion reports psychological distress in 48.83% of students. Our copy does not report the cited percentages for depression, severe anxiety, or extremely severe stress. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Levels of stress, depression, and anxiety declined compared to the beginning of the pandemic.

    “if these results are compared to the findings of one study conducted at the beginning of the pandemic, we can observe that levels of stress, depression, and anxiety declined.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kostić, J., Žikić, O., Đorđević, V., & Krivokapić, Ž.
Affiliations
  • University of Nis (RS)
  • Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Yogyakarta (ID)
Corresponding author
Kostić, Jelena
Venue
Annals of General Psychiatry
Published
2021-04-07
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
25-25
ISSN
1744-859X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3118952121
Cited by
41
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8
FWCI
6.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Keywords
perceived stress, university students, COVID-19 pandemic, student mental health, coping strategies, avoidance coping, anxiety, depression, insomnia, social dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review