Cited by 22Child Abuse and TraumaSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesChild Welfare and Adoption

Adverse childhood experiences and stimulant use disorders among adults in the United States

Open access
Tang, Shichao, Jones, Christopher M., Wisdom, April, Lin, Hsien-Chang, Bacon, Sarah, Houry, Debra·2021·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Recent data indicate a resurgence of stimulant use and harms in the United States; thus, there is a need to identify risk factors to inform development of effective prevention strategies. Prior research suggests adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are common among individuals using stimulants and may be an important target for prevention. National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions was used to estimate prevalence of ACEs among U.S. adults using amphetamine-type stimulants (ATS), cocaine, or both. Multivariable logistic regression examined associations between ACEs and stimulant use and use disorders. Among adults reporting lifetime ATS use, 22.1% had ≥4 ACEs, 24.9% had 2-3 ACEs, 22.4% had 1 ACE, 30.6% reported no ACEs. Among adults with lifetime ATS use disorder, 29.3% reported ≥4 ACEs, 28.7% reported 2-3 ACEs, 21.6% reported 1 ACE, and 20.4% reported no ACEs. Multivariable logistic regression found a significant relationship between number of ACEs and stimulant use and use disorders. In conclusion, we found a strong relationship between increasing ACE exposures and stimulant use and use disorders. Advancing comprehensive strategies to prevent ACEs and treating underlying trauma among those using stimulants holds great promise to reduce stimulant use and its health and social consequences in the United States.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.113870

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2019). 2018 national survey on drug use and health. Detailed tables. Retrieved June 1 from https://www.samhsa.gov/data/report/2018-nsduh-detailed-tables. 30480921

Cited by

Authors
Tang, S., Jones, C. M., Wisdom, A., Lin, H.-C., Bacon, S., & Houry, D.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Tang, Shichao
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
299
Pages
113870
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3137432044
Cited by
22
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
adverse childhood experiences, stimulant use disorder, amphetamine-type stimulants, cocaine use, childhood trauma, risk factors, substance use prevention, trauma-informed care, prevalence
MeSH terms
Adverse Childhood Experiences, Adult, Humans, Risk Factors, United States, Prevalence, Logistic Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review