Cited by 346Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-5 (AUDADIS-5): Reliability of substance use and psychiatric disorder modules in a general population sample

Open access
Grant, Bridget F., Goldstein, Rise B., Smith, Sharon M., Jung, Jeesun, Zhang, Haitao, Chou, Sanchen P., Pickering, Roger P., Ruan, Wenjun J. +5 more·2015·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Background The purpose of this study was to assess the test-retest reliability of substance use disorder and psychiatric modules in the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) Version (AUDADIS-5). Methods Kappa and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated for DSM-5 substance use and psychiatric disorder diagnoses and dimensional criteria scales using a test-retest design among 1006 respondents drawn from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III (NESARC-III). Results Reliabilities of substance use disorder diagnoses and associated criteria scales were generally good to excellent, while reliabilities for mood, anxiety and trauma and stress-related disorders and associated scales were generally in the fair to good range. Conclusions The observed reliability of the DSM-5 diagnoses and dimensional scales for the substance use and psychiatric disorders found in this study indicates that the AUDADIS-5 can be a useful tool in various research settings, particularly in studies of the general population, the target population for which it was designed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.11.026

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data were adjusted for oversampling and nonresponse and weighted to represent the US civilian population based on the 2012 American Community Survey.

    “Data were adjusted for oversampling and nonresponse and weighted to represent the US civilian population based on the 2012 American Community Survey.25”

    From Epidemiology of Adult <i>DSM-5</i> Major Depressive Disorder and Its Specifiers in the United States (2018) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Methods (Section 2.1 Sample; page unavailable) identify the target as the US non-institutionalized civilian adult population and describe higher selection probabilities for minority respondents. The paper reports response rates, but our copy does not say that the data were adjusted for oversampling or nonresponse, or weighted using the 2012 American Community Survey. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Bromet EJ Dunn LO Connel MM Dew MA Schulber HC 1986 Longterm reliability of diagnosing lifetime major depression in a community sample Arch Gen Psychiatry 43 435 440 3964022
  2. Canino GJ Bravo M Ramirez R Febo V Fernandez R Hasin DS 1999 The Spanish Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule (AUDADIS): reliability and concordance with clinical diagnoses in a Hispanic population J Stud Alcohol 60 790 799 10606491
  3. Chatterji S Saunders JB Vrasti R Grant BF Hasin D Mager D 1997 Reliability of the alcohol and drug modules of the Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule – Alcohol/Drug –revised (AUDADIS-ADR): an international comparison Drug Alcohol Depend 47 171 185 9306043
  4. Clark LA 2007 Assessment and diagnosis of personality disorder: perennial issues and an emerging reconceptualization Annu Rev Psychol 58 227 257 16903806
  5. Close RJ Sachs CJ Dyne PL 2001 Reliability of bimanual pelvic examinations performed in emergency departments West J Med 175 240 244 11577050 PMC1071590
  6. Easton C Meza E Mager D Ulüg B Kilic C Göğüş A Babor TF 1997 Test-retest reliability of the alcohol and drug use disorder sections of the schedules for clinical assessment in neuropsychiatry (SCAN) Drug Alcohol Depend 47 187 94 9306044
  7. Grant BF Dawson DA Hasin DS 2001 The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fourth Edition Version (AUDADIS-IV) National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Bethesda, MD
  8. Grant BF Dawson DA Chou SP Dufour MC Pickering RP 2004 The 12-month prevalence and trends in DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence, United States, 1991–1992 and 2001–2002 Drug Alcohol Depend 74 223 234 15194200
  9. Grant BF Dawson DA Stinson FS Chou SP Kay W Pickering RP 2003a The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-IV (AUDADIS-IV): reliability of alcohol consumption, tobacco use, family history of depression and psychiatric diagnostic modules in a general population sample Drug Alcohol Depend 71 7 16 12821201
  10. Grant BF Goldstein RB Chou SP Saha TD Ruan WJ Huang B Smith SM Zhang H Jung J Pickering RP Aivadyan C Greenstein E Hasin DS 2011 The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule-Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition Version (AUDADIS-5) National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Rockville, MD
  11. Grant BF Harford TC Dawson DA Chou PS Pickering RP 1995 The Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule (AUDADIS: reliability of alcohol and drug modules in a general population sample Drug Alcohol Depend 39 37 44 7587973
  12. Helzer JF Robins LN Croughan JL Welner A 1981 Renard Diagnostic Interview (RDI): its reliability and procedural validity with physicians and lay interviewers Arch Gen Psychiatry 38 393 398 7212969
  13. Helzer JF van der Brink W Guth SE 2006 Should there be both categorical and dimensional criteria for the substance use disorders in DSM-5? Addiction 101 Suppl 1 17 22 16930157
  14. Marin JR Bilker W Lautenbach E Alpern ER 2010 Reliability of clinical examinations for pediatric skin and soft-tissue infections Pediatrics 126 925 930 20974788 PMC3228243
  15. Meyers JL Shmulewitz D Aharonovich E Waxman R Frisch A Weizman A Spivak B Edenberg HJ Gelernter J Hasin DS 2013 Alcohol metabolizing genes and alcohol phenotypes in an Israeli household sample Alcohol Clin Exp Res 37 1872 81 23895337 PMC3812252
  16. Meyers JL Shmulewitz D Wall MM Keyes KM Aharonovich E Spivak B Weizman A Frisch A Edenberg HJ Gelernter J Grant BF Hasin DS 2013 Childhood adversity moderates the effect of ADH1B on risk for alcohol-related phenotypes in Jewish Israeli drinkers Addict Biol 17 105 118 PMC3999313 24164917
  17. Narrow WE Kuhl EA 2011 Dimensional approaches to psychiatric diagnosis in DSM-5 J Ment Health Policy Econ 14 197 200 22345361
  18. Pedersen G Karterud S Hummelen B Wilberg T 2013 The impact of extended longitudinal observation on the assessment of personality disorders Personal Ment Health 7 277 287 24343977
  19. Regier D 2012 Merging categorical and dimensional diagnoses of mental disorders Epidemiol Psych Sci 21 267 269 22794506
  20. Regier DA 2007 Dimensional approaches to psychiatric classification: refining the research agenda for DSM-IV: an introduction Int J Methods Psychiatry Res 16 S1 S5 PMC6879077 17623390
  21. Rueter MA Chao W Conger RD 2000 The effect of systematic variation in retrospective conduct disorder reports on antisocial personality disorder diagnoses J Consult Clin Psychol 68 307 312 10780131
  22. Vrasti R Grant BF Chatterji S Ustun BT Mager D Olteanu I Bodoi M 1998 The reliability of the Romanian version of the alcohol module of the WHO Alcohol Use Disorder and Associated Disabilities Interview Schedule – Alcohol/Drug-Revised (AUDADIS-ADR) Eur Addict Res 4 144 149 9852366
  23. Wacker H Bettegay R Mullejans R Schlossor C Stephanis C Ravavilas A Soldatos C 1991 Using the CIDI-C in a General Population Elsevier Science Publishers New York 27 36
  24. Wallace DE McGreal GT O’Toole G Holloway P Wallace M McDermott EW Blake J 2000 The influence of experience and specialization on the reliability of a common clinical sign Ann R Coll Surg Engl 82 336 338 PMC2503602 11041034
  25. Williams JB Gibbon M First MB Spitzer RL Davies M Borus J Howes MJ Kane J Pope HG Jr Rounsaville B 1992 The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). II. Multisite test-retest reliability Arch Gen Psychiatry 49 8 630 6 1637253
  26. Wittchen HU 1994 Reliability and validity studies of the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI): a critical review J Psychiatry Res 28 57 84 8064641
  27. Wittchen HU Kessler R Zhao S Abelson J 1995 Reliability and clinical validity of the UN-CIDI DSM-III-R generalized anxiety disorder J Psychiatry Res 29 95 110 7666382
  28. Wittchen HU Abelson JL Kessler RC 1996 Reliability and procedural validity of UM-CIDI DSM-III-R phobic disorders Psychol Med 26 1169 1177 8931163
  29. Zimmerman M 1994 Diagnosing personality disorders: a review of issues and research methods Arch Gen Psychiatry 51 225 245 8122959

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grant, B. F., Goldstein, R. B., Smith, S. M., Jung, J., Zhang, H., Chou, S. P., Pickering, R. P., Ruan, W. J., Huang, B., Saha, T. D., Aivadyan, C., Greenstein, E., & Hasin, D. S.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (US)
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Grant, Bridget F.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
148
Pages
27-33
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984840298
Cited by
346
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 1
FWCI
12.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (Z01AA000449, K05AA014223)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K24DA022412)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHSN275200900007C)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
test-retest reliability, substance use disorders, mental illness, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, trauma and stress-related disorders, NESARC-III, general population
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Alcoholism, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Population Surveillance, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Reproducibility of Results, Alcohol-Related Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review