Cited by 14Sleep and related disordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesCircadian rhythm and melatonin

Diurnal variation in anxiety and activity is influenced by chronotype and probable anxiety-related disorder status

Open access
Cox, Rebecca C., Wright, Kenneth P., Axelsson, John, Balter, Leonie J.T.·2024·Psychiatry Research

Abstract

Anxiety symptoms vary moment-to-moment within a day. One factor that may influence these variations is chronotype. Evening chronotypes prefer to engage in activities (e.g., sleep, physical and social activity) later in the day, and evening chronotype is implicated in psychopathology, including anxiety-related disorders. However, it is unknown whether chronotype influences diurnal variation in anxiety symptoms and whether these effects are amplified in individuals with a probable anxiety-related disorder. We examined the diurnal variation in anxiety symptoms and daily activities in morning and evening chronotypes with and without probable generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) or obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) in a community sample of adults (N = 410). Evening chronotypes reported higher anxiety symptoms, particularly in the evening hours, and lower engagement in daily activities, predominantly in the morning hours. Evening chronotypes with probable GAD or OCD reported worse anxiety symptoms in the evening. Our findings indicate that anxiety symptoms and engagement in daily activities fluctuate considerably across the day, and these patterns differ depending on chronotype. Evening chronotypes have more anxiety symptoms in the evening, despite preferring this time of day. Personalized treatment approaches that consider chronotype and target certain times of day may be efficient in alleviating peaks in anxiety symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116006

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cox, R. C., Wright, K. P., Axelsson, J., & Balter, L. J. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
Corresponding author
Balter, Leonie J.T.
Venue
Psychiatry Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-08
Volume
338
Pages
116006
ISSN
0165-1781 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399272645
Cited by
13
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7
FWCI
5.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32HL149646)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
chronotype, diurnal variation, anxiety symptoms, generalized anxiety disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, evening chronotype, personalized treatment, circadian rhythm
MeSH terms
Chronotype, Activities of Daily Living, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Sleep, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review