CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 45

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Phytoliths in modern plants from amazonia and the neotropics at large: Implications for vegetation history reconstruction

Piperno, Dolores R., McMichael, Crystal·2020·Quaternary International
DOI 10.1016/j.quaint.2020.10.043
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.quaint.2020.10.043

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. Amos, G.L. Silica in Timbers. Bulletin No. 267, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Melbourne, l952.
  2. Barboni, 2007, Comparative studies of modern phytolith assemblages from inter-tropical Africa, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 246, 454, 10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.10.012 · DOI
  3. Bigalke, 1933, Die blattspodogramme der Urticaceae und ihre verwendbarkeit fȕr die systematik, Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen, 21, 1
  4. Brugger, 2016, Long-term man-environment interactions in the Bolivian Amazon: 8000 years of vegetation dynamics, Quat. Sci. Rev., 132, 114, 10.1016/j.quascirev.2015.11.001 · DOI
  5. Capriles, 2019, Persistent early to middle Holocene tropical foraging in southwestern Amazonia, Sci. Advan., 5
  6. Cardoso, 2017, Amazon plant diversity revealed by a taxonomically verified species list, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 114, 10695, 10.1073/pnas.1706756114 · DOI
  7. Carson, 2014, Environmental impact of geometric earthwork construction in pre-Columbian Amazonia, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 111, 10497, 10.1073/pnas.1321770111 · DOI
  8. Carson, 2015, Pre-Columbian land use in the ring-ditch region of the Bolivian Amazon, Holocene, 25, 1285, 10.1177/0959683615581204 · DOI
  9. Chandler-Ezell, 2006, Root and tuber phytoliths and starch grains document manioc (Manihot esculenta), arrowroot (Maranta arundinacea), and llerén (calathea sp.) at the real alto site, Ecuador, Econ. Bot., 60, 103, 10.1663/0013-0001(2006)60[103:RATPAS]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  10. Chen, 2013, Phytolith variability in Zingiberales: a tool for the reconstruction of past tropical vegetation, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 370, 1, 10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.10.026 · DOI
  11. Clement, 2010, Origin and domestication of native amazonian crops, Diversity, 2, 72, 10.3390/d2010072 · DOI
  12. Clement, 2015, The domestication of Amazonia before European conquest, Proc. Roy. Soc. B., 282, 20150813, 10.1098/rspb.2015.0813 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Clement, 2015, Response to comment by McMichael, Piperno and bush, Proc. Roy. Soc. B., 282, 20152459, 10.1098/rspb.2015.2459 · DOI
  14. Collura, 2017, Wood and bark phytoliths of West African woody plants, Quat. Int., 434, 142, 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.12.070 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Crűger, 1857, Westindische fragmente, 9, El Cauto. Bot. Zeitung., 15, 281
  16. Denevan, 2011, The pristine myth revisited, Geogr. Rev., 101, 576, 10.1111/j.1931-0846.2011.00118.x · DOI
  17. Dickau, 2012, Diversity of cultivars and other plant resources used at habitation sites in the Llanos de Mojos, Beni, Bolivia: evidence from macrobotanical remains, starch grains, and phytoliths, J. Archaeol. Sci., 39, 357, 10.1016/j.jas.2011.09.021 · DOI
  18. Dickau, 2013, Differentiation of neotropical ecosystems by modern soil phytolith assemblages and its implications for palaeoenvironmental and archaeological reconstructions, Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 193, 15, 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2013.01.004 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Fedick, 2010, The maya forest: destroyed or cultivated by the ancient maya?, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 107, 953, 10.1073/pnas.0913578107 · DOI
  20. Ferreira, 2019, Legacies of intensive management in forests around pre-columbian and modern settlements in the Madeira-Tapajós interfluve, Amazonia, Acta Bot. Bras., 33, 212, 10.1590/0102-33062018abb0339 · DOI
  21. Flatua, 2016, Geochronological database and classification system for age uncertainties in Neotropical pollen records, Clim. Past, 12, 387, 10.5194/cp-12-387-2016 · DOI
  22. Frey-Wyssling, 1930, Űber die Ausscheidung der Kieselsäure in der Pflanze, Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges., 48, 179, 10.1111/j.1438-8677.1930.tb00637.x · DOI
  23. Gomes, 2020, Modelling the distribution of Amazonian tree species in response to long-term climate change during the Mid-Late Holocene, J. Biogeogr., 10.1111/jbi.13833 · DOI
  24. Gomes, 2020, Post-agricultural succession in the fallow swiddens of Southeastern Brazil, For. Ecol. Manag., 475
  25. Heckenberger, 2013, Who is Amazonia? The ‘salt of the matter’ for indigenous sustainability, Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/041007 · DOI
  26. Heijink, 2020, Holocene increases in palm abundances in north‐western Amazonia, J. Biogeogr., 47, 698, 10.1111/jbi.13721 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Hodell, 2008, An 85-ka record of climate change in lowland Central America, Quat. Sci. Rev., 27, 1152, 10.1016/j.quascirev.2008.02.008 · DOI
  28. Huisman, 2018, Palm phytoliths of mid-elevation Andean forests, Fron. Ecol. Evol., 10.3389/fevo.2018.00193 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Huisman, 2019, Four centuries of vegetation change in the mid-elevation Andean forests of Ecuador, Veg. Hist. Archaeobotany, 28, 679, 10.1007/s00334-019-00715-8 · DOI
  30. Neumann, 2019, International code for phytolith nomenclature, Ann. Bot., 124, 189, 10.1093/aob/mcz064 · DOI
  31. Iriarte, 2009, Phytolith analysis of selected native plants and modern soils from southeastern Uruguay and its implications for paleoenvironmental and archeological reconstruction, Quat. Int., 193, 99, 10.1016/j.quaint.2007.10.008 · DOI
  32. Iriarte, 2012, Fire-free land use in pre-1492 Amazonian savannas, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 109, 6473, 10.1073/pnas.1201461109 · DOI
  33. Kelly, 2018, Continuous human presence without extensive reductions in forest cover over the past 2500 years in an aseasonal Amazonian rainforest, J. Quat. Sci., 33, 369, 10.1002/jqs.3019 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Kondo, R., Peason, T., l98l. Opal Phytoliths in Tree Leaves (Part 2): Opal Phytoliths in Dicotyledon Angiosperm Tree Leaves. Research Bulletin of Obihiro University, Series l, Vol l2, 2l7-230.
  35. Levis, 2012, Historical human footprint on modern tree species composition in the Purus-Madeira Interfluve, central Amazonia, PloS One, 7, 10.1371/journal.pone.0048559 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Levis, 2017, Persistent effects of pre-Columbian plant domestication on Amazonian forest composition, Science, 355, 925, 10.1126/science.aal0157 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Lombardo, 2019, Holocene land cover change in southwestern Amazonia inferred from paleoflood archives, Global Planet. Change, 174, 105, 10.1016/j.gloplacha.2019.01.008 · DOI
  38. Lux, 2020, Silicification of root tissues, Plants, 9, 111, 10.3390/plants9010111 · DOI
  39. Maezumi, 2018, The legacy of 4,500 years of polyculture agroforestry in the eastern Amazon, Nature Plants, 4, 540, 10.1038/s41477-018-0205-y · DOI · Paper page
  40. Mazumdar, 2011, Phytoliths of pteridophytes, South african j Bot, 77, 10, 10.1016/j.sajb.2010.07.020 · DOI
  41. McMichael, 2012, Sparse pre-Columbian human habitation in western Amazonia, Science, 336, 1429, 10.1126/science.1219982 · DOI · Paper page
  42. McMichael, 2012, Spatial and temporal scales of pre-Columbian disturbance associated with western Amazonian lakes, Holocene, 22, 131, 10.1177/0959683611414932 · DOI · Paper page
  43. McMichael, 2015, Comment on Clement et al. 2015 ‘The domestication of Amazonia before European conquest’, Proc. Roy. Soc. B., 282, 20151837, 10.1098/rspb.2015.1837 · DOI
  44. McNeil, 2010, Evidence disputing deforestation as the cause for the collapse of the ancient Maya polity of Copan, Honduras, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 107, 1017, 10.1073/pnas.0904760107 · DOI
  45. Mercader, 2009, Phytoliths in woody plants from the Miombo woodlands of Mozambique, Ann. Bot., 104, 91, 10.1093/aob/mcp097 · DOI
  46. Mobius, 1908, Über die Festlegung der Kalksalze und Kieselkörper in den Pflanzengellen, Ber. Dtsch. Bot. Ges., 26a, 29
  47. Morcote-Ríos, 2016, Phytoliths as a tool for archaeobotanical, palaeobotanical and palaeoecological studies in Amazonian palms, Bot. Jour. Linn. Soc., 182, 348, 10.1111/boj.12438 · DOI
  48. Piperno, 1989, The occurrence of phytoliths in the reproductive structures of selected tropical angiosperms and their significance in tropical paleoecology, paleoethnobotany, and systematics, Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 61, 147, 10.1016/0034-6667(89)90067-5 · DOI
  49. Piperno, 2011, The origins of plant cultivation and domestication in the New World tropics: patterns, process, and new developments, Curr. Anthropol., 52, S453, 10.1086/659998 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Piperno, 2003, Paleoecological and archaeological implications of a late Pleistocene/early Holocene record of vegetation and climate from the pacific coastal plain of Panama, Quat. Res., 59, 79, 10.1016/S0033-5894(02)00021-2 · DOI
  51. Piperno, 2015, Amazonia and the Anthropocene: what was the spatial extent and intensity of human landscape modification in the Amazon Basin at the end of prehistory?, Holocene, 25, 1588, 10.1177/0959683615588374 · DOI
  52. Piperno, 2019, Finding forest management in prehistoric Amazonia, Anthropocene, 26, 100211, 10.1016/j.ancene.2019.100211 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Piperno, D.R., l985. Phytolith analysis and tropical paleo-ecology: production and taxonomic significance of siliceous forms in new World plant domesticates and wild species. Rev. Paleobot. Palynol. 45, l85-228. · DOI
  54. Plumpton, 2019, Long-term impacts of mid-Holocene drier climatic conditions on Bolivian tropical dry forests, Quat. Res., 93, 204, 10.1017/qua.2019.55 · DOI
  55. Plumpton, 2019, Ecosystem turnover in palaeoecological records: the sensitivity of pollen and phytolith proxies to detecting vegetation change in southwestern Amazonia, Holocene, 29, 1720, 10.1177/0959683619862021 · DOI
  56. Plumpton, 2020, Paleoecological potential of phytoliths from lake sediment records from the tropical lowlands of Bolivia, Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 275, 104113, 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2019.104113 · DOI
  57. Prychid, 2003, Systematics and biology of silica bodies in monocotyledons, Bot. Rev., 69, 340, 10.1663/0006-8101(2004)069[0377:SABOSB]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  58. Runge, 1999, The opal phytolith inventory of soils in central Africa—quantities, shapes, classification, and spectra, Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 107, 23, 10.1016/S0034-6667(99)00018-4 · DOI
  59. Sangster, 1978, Silicon in the roots of higher plants, Amer. Jour. Bot., 65, 929, 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1978.tb06157.x · DOI
  60. Scoles, 2011, Population structure of Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa, Lecythidaceae) stands in two areas with different occupation histories in the Brazilian Amazon, Human. Ecol., 39, 455, 10.1007/s10745-011-9412-0 · DOI
  61. Slik, 2015, An estimate of the number of tropical tree species, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 112, 7472, 10.1073/pnas.1423147112 · DOI
  62. Solereder, H., l908. Systematic Anatomy of the Dicotyledons, translated by L.A. Boodle and F.E. Frisch, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  63. ter Steege, 2013, Hyperdominance in the Amazonian tree flora, Science, 342, 1243092, 10.1126/science.1243092 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Ter Welle, B.J.H., l976. Silica Grains in Woody Plants of the Neotropics, Especially Surinam. Leiden Botanical Series, No. vol. 3, pp. l07-l42.
  65. Tomlinson, P.B., l969. Anatomy of the Monocotyledons III: Commelinales-Zingiberales. Oxford University Press, London.
  66. Tomlinson, P.B., l96l. Anatomy of the Monocotyledons II: Palmae. Oxford University Press, London.
  67. Watling, 2013, Phytoliths from the coastal savannas of French Guiana, Quat. Int., 287, 162, 10.1016/j.quaint.2012.10.030 · DOI
  68. Watling, 2016, Differentiation of neotropical ecosystems by modern soil phytoliths assemblages and its implications for palaeoenvironmental and archaeological reconstructions II: southwestern Amazonian forests, Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol., 226, 30, 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2015.12.002 · DOI
  69. Watling, 2017, Impact of pre-Columbian “geoglyph” builders on Amazonian forests, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 114, 1868, 10.1073/pnas.1614359114 · DOI
  70. Watling, 2018, Direct archaeological evidence for Southwestern Amazonia as an early plant domestication and food production centre, PloS One, 13, 10.1371/journal.pone.0199868 · DOI
  71. Watling, 2020, Phytoliths from native plants and surface soils from the Upper Madeira river, SW Amazonia, and their potential for paleoecological reconstruction, Quat. Int., 10.1016/j.quaint.2020.03.045 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Whitney, 2011, A 45kyr palaeoclimate record from the lowland interior of tropical South America, Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol., 307, 177, 10.1016/j.palaeo.2011.05.012 · DOI
  73. Whitney, 2014, Pre-Columbian raised-field agriculture and land use in the Bolivian Amazon, Holocene, 24, 231, 10.1177/0959683613517401 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Piperno, D. R., & McMichael, C.
Venue
Quaternary International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
565
Pages
54-74
ISSN
1040-6182
DOI
10.1016/j.quaint.2020.10.043
Cited by
45
References
0
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
  • National Science Foundation (1821816)
  • Missouri Botanical Garden
  • National Museum of Natural History
  • Wenner-Gren Foundation (9648)
  • European Research Council (853394)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review