Cited by 59Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationDigitalization, Law, and RegulationHealthcare Regulation

Regulatory Issues and Challenges to Artificial Intelligence Adoption

Harvey, Harlan Benjamin, Gowda, Vrushab·2021·Radiologic Clinics of North America

Abstract

Artificial intelligence technology promises to redefine the practice of radiology. However, it exists in a nascent phase and remains largely untested in the clinical space. This nature is both a cause and consequence of the uncertain legal-regulatory environment it enters. This discussion aims to shed light on these challenges, tracing the various pathways toward approval by the US Food and Drug Administration, the future of government oversight, privacy issues, ethical dilemmas, and practical considerations related to implementation in radiologist practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.rcl.2021.07.007

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A forward-looking approach to tracking and adhering to emerging regulations ensures that the integration of AI into medical education aligns with evolving legal frameworks.

    “This forward-looking approach ensures that the integration of AI into medical education aligns with evolving legal frameworks, thereby safeguarding patient data, ensuring privacy, and upholding the ethical standards essential to responsible AI deployment in healthcare settings [53].”
  • Alignment of AI integration in medical education with evolving legal frameworks safeguards patient data, ensures privacy, and upholds ethical standards essential to responsible AI deployment in healthcare settings.

    “This forward-looking approach ensures that the integration of AI into medical education aligns with evolving legal frameworks, thereby safeguarding patient data, ensuring privacy, and upholding the ethical standards essential to responsible AI deployment in healthcare settings [53].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harvey, H. B., & Gowda, V.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Harvey, Harlan Benjamin
Venue
Radiologic Clinics of North America
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
59
Issue
6
Pages
1075-1083
ISSN
0033-8389 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3211326841
Cited by
59
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiologic Clinics of North America (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Regulation
Keywords
artificial intelligence adoption, radiology, regulatory challenges, government oversight, data privacy, AI ethics, clinical implementation, AI regulation
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Diagnostic Imaging, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Radiology, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review