Cited by 254Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationExplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Big data and black-box medical algorithms

Open access
Price, W. Nicholson·2018·Science Translational Medicine

Abstract

New machine-learning techniques entering medicine present challenges in validation, regulation, and integration into practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/scitranslmed.aao5333

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kernels or intermediate features of a trained neural network may shed light on the learned structure in different layers of the network, giving rise to methods like class activation mapping (CAM).

    “For example, the kernels or intermediate features of a trained neural network may shed light on the learned structure in different layers of the network, giving rise to methods like class activation mapping (CAM).67”
  • Perceived opacity of medical AI is an important barrier to its adoption.

    “We propose that another important barrier to adoption of medical AI is its perceived opacity, that it is a 'black box' 13,14 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 12 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Price, W. N.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Price, W. Nicholson
Venue
Science Translational Medicine
Published
2018-12-12
Volume
10
Issue
471
ISSN
  • 1946-6234 (ISSN-L)
  • 1946-6242
OpenAlex
W2905322176
Cited by
254
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 12
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science Translational Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute (1-R01-CA-214829-01-A1)
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF17SA0027784)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
big data, black-box algorithms, machine learning in medicine, algorithm validation, integration into clinical practice, algorithmic transparency
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Big Data, Algorithms, Social Control, Formal, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review