Cited by 277Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementSustainable Design and DevelopmentSustainable Building Design and Assessment

Circular building materials: Carbon saving potential and the role of business model innovation and public policy

Nußholz, Julia L.K., Nygaard Rasmussen, Freja, Milios, Leonidas·2019·Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.036

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Material reuse is cost-effective and environmentally friendly.

    “It is cost-effective and environmentally friendly [79,81,95].”
  • In many instances, coordination between the owners of the demolition site and the new building never happens.

    “However, in many instances, this coordination never happens (Dunant et al., 2018, Nußholz et al., 2019).”

    From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Nußholz et al., 2019

  • A Danish company involved in brick reuse could overcome certain limitations by changing its business model by integrating deconstruction into its scope to safeguard a more sustainable supply of the reused bricks.

    “According to this study, a Danish company involved in brick reuse could overcome certain limitations by changing its business model by integrating deconstruction into its scope to safeguard a more sustainable supply of the reused bricks.”

    From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Nußholz et al. (2019)

  • Recognition of reuse in the public debate can enhance public awareness and promote reuse.

    “Nußholz et al. (2019) reports recognition of reuse in the public debate can enhance public awareness and promotes reuse.”

    From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Nußholz et al. (2019)

  • Visual appearance can be a point of further discussion since it is highly subjective and can be attractive to some people.

    “However, the visual appearance can be a point of further discussion since it is highly subjective and can be attractive to some people (Nußholz et al., 2019).”

    From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Nußholz et al., 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nußholz, J. L. K., Nygaard Rasmussen, F., & Milios, L.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Nußholz, Julia L.K.
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-02
Volume
141
Pages
308-316
ISSN
0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2899831913
Cited by
277
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 12
FWCI
33.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Mistra
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
Keywords
circular building materials, secondary raw materials, carbon savings, embodied carbon, low-carbon construction, business model innovation, public policy, circular economy, resource efficiency, construction and demolition waste, material recovery, life cycle cost, Scandinavian companies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review