Circular building materials: Carbon saving potential and the role of business model innovation and public policy
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Material reuse is cost-effective and environmentally friendly.
“It is cost-effective and environmentally friendly [79,81,95].”
From Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Wood Waste—A Theoretical Framework Approach (2022) · cites this paper as [95]
In many instances, coordination between the owners of the demolition site and the new building never happens.
“However, in many instances, this coordination never happens (Dunant et al., 2018, Nußholz et al., 2019).”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Nußholz et al., 2019
A Danish company involved in brick reuse could overcome certain limitations by changing its business model by integrating deconstruction into its scope to safeguard a more sustainable supply of the reused bricks.
“According to this study, a Danish company involved in brick reuse could overcome certain limitations by changing its business model by integrating deconstruction into its scope to safeguard a more sustainable supply of the reused bricks.”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Nußholz et al. (2019)
Recognition of reuse in the public debate can enhance public awareness and promote reuse.
“Nußholz et al. (2019) reports recognition of reuse in the public debate can enhance public awareness and promotes reuse.”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Nußholz et al. (2019)
Visual appearance can be a point of further discussion since it is highly subjective and can be attractive to some people.
“However, the visual appearance can be a point of further discussion since it is highly subjective and can be attractive to some people (Nußholz et al., 2019).”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Nußholz et al., 2019
There are concerns regarding adverse effects of reuse due to increased GHG emissions related to deconstruction activities and transportation of recovered elements.
“Although component reuse is identified as a sustainable end-of-life treatment of the superstructure of a building (Brütting et al., 2019; Klang et al., 2003; Tingley et al., 2017; Yeung et al., 2017), there are concerns regarding the adverse effects of this practise due to the increased GHG emissions related to deconstruction activities and the transportation of recovered elements (Brambilla et al”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Nußholz et al., 2019
Case study companies developed certifying standards to assure the quality of their products.
“In this study, the case study companies developed certifying standards to assure the quality of their products.”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Nußholz et al., 2019
Close cooperation between construction and demolition companies can address the barrier of lack of a mature reuse market.
“Hence, as advised by Dunant et al. (2018) and Nußholz et al. (2019), close cooperation between construction and demolition companies can address this barrier.”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Nußholz et al., 2019
Most companies are reluctant to change their business model.
“Although some innovative companies, such as Gamle Mursten in Denmark, integrate deconstruction into its core business (Nußholz et al., 2019), most companies are reluctant to change their business model.”
From Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review (2020) · cites this paper as Nußholz et al., 2019
Cites
Circular Business Models: Defining a Concept and Framing an Emerging Research Field
Nußholz, J. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9101810 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Self-citationLindahl, M., Sundin, E., & Sakao, T. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.047 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Passer, A., Lasvaux, S., Allacker, K., De Lathauwer, D., Spirinckx, C., Wittstock, B., Kellenberger, D., Gschösser, F., Wall, J., & Wallbaum, H. (2015) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-015-0926-3 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Components reuse in the building sector – A systematic review
Rakhshan, K., Morel, J.-C., Alaka, H., & Charef, R. (2020) · Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy · doi:10.1177/0734242x20910463 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
Rahla, K. M., Mateus, R., & Bragança, L. (2021) · Infrastructures · doi:10.3390/infrastructures6040049 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Circular Economy of Construction and Demolition Wood Waste—A Theoretical Framework Approach
Jahan, I., Zhang, G., Bhuiyan, M., & Navaratnam, S. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141710478 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nußholz, J. L. K., Nygaard Rasmussen, F., & Milios, L.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Nußholz, Julia L.K.
- Venue
- Resources, Conservation and Recycling
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-02
- Volume
- 141
- Pages
- 308-316
- ISSN
- 0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2899831913
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 12
- FWCI
- 33.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Mistra
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
- Keywords
- circular building materials, secondary raw materials, carbon savings, embodied carbon, low-carbon construction, business model innovation, public policy, circular economy, resource efficiency, construction and demolition waste, material recovery, life cycle cost, Scandinavian companies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review