Cited by 34Sharing Economy and PlatformsEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilitySustainable Supply Chain Management

What if everyone becomes a sharer? A quantification of the environmental impact of access-based consumption for household laundry activities

Open access
Wasserbaur, Raphael, Sakao, Tomohiko, Ljunggren Söderman, Maria, Plepys, Andrius, Dalhammar, Carl·2020·Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Abstract

In order to meet the EU's climate and resource efficiency targets, changes in our daily-life behaviours, as well as business models, are urgently necessary. More insights are needed to make real changes based on research with a systems perspective. We developed a system dynamics model to analyse the environmental benefits of a transition from ownership-based to access-based household laundry activities. The model considers demographic, technological and behavioural aspects and thereby assesses the environmental impact of laundry activities. The model is applied to the Swedish as well as the European context and allows cross-country comparisons. The results indicate a significant potential of the sharing economy. The higher utilisation of shared machines and extended lifespans of the machines can cut greenhouse gas emissions by a third and lower raw material usage overall and lower primary raw material in production due to higher recycling rates. The carbon intensity of the energy mix is a crucial factor for the environmental consequences that arise through changes in energy usage due to sharing economy practices. This case study shows the value of adopting policies that could promote sharing and extended life spans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104780

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Stahel, 1994, The utilization-focused service economy - Resource Efficiency and product-life extension, Green. Indust. Ecosyst., 178

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wasserbaur, R., Sakao, T., Ljunggren Söderman, M., Plepys, A., & Dalhammar, C.
Affiliations
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Wasserbaur, Raphael
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
158
Pages
104780
ISSN
0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3012223725
Cited by
34
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Stiftelsen för Miljöstrategisk Forskning
  • H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Sharing Economy and Platforms
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
sharing economy, access-based consumption, household laundry, washing machines, system dynamics modeling, environmental impact, greenhouse gas emissions, raw material use, recycling rate, cross-national comparison, Sweden, Europe

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-18.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review