CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 61

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Nudging to promote household waste source separation: Mechanisms and spillover effects

Zhang, Zhijian, Wang, Xueyuan·2020·Resources, Conservation and Recycling
DOI 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105054
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105054

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 75

  1. Allcott, 2010, Behavior and energy policy, Science, 327, 1204, 10.1126/science.1180775 · DOI
  2. Allcott, 2014, The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: experimental evidence from energy conservation, Am. Econ. Rev., 104, 3003, 10.1257/aer.104.10.3003 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Allers, 2010, Effects of unit-based garbage pricing: a differences-in-differences approach, Environ. Resour. Econ., 45, 405, 10.1007/s10640-009-9320-6 · DOI
  4. Anderson, 2016, Superstitions, street traffic, and subjective well-being, J. Public Econ., 142, 1, 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.07.005 · DOI
  5. Ariely, 2009, Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially, Am. Econ. Rev., 99, 544, 10.1257/aer.99.1.544 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Asensio, 2016, The dynamics of behavior change: evidence from energy conservation, J. Econ. Behav. Organ., 126, 196, 10.1016/j.jebo.2016.03.012 · DOI
  7. Bao, 2015, Heterogeneous effects of informational nudges on pro-social behavior, BE J. Econ. Anal. Poli., 15, 1619, 10.1515/bejeap-2014-0125 · DOI
  8. Barile, 2015, Will one size fit all? Incentives designed to nurture prosocial behaviour, J. Behav. Exp. Econ., 57, 9, 10.1016/j.socec.2015.04.004 · DOI
  9. Bénabou, 2006, Incentives and prosocial behavior, Am. Econ. Rev., 96, 1652, 10.1257/aer.96.5.1652 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Bernedo, 2014, The persistent impacts of norm-based messaging and their implications for water conservation, J. Consum. Poli., 37, 437, 10.1007/s10603-014-9266-0 · DOI
  11. Boonrod, 2015, Enhancing organic waste separation at the source behavior: a case study of the application of motivation mechanisms in communities in Thailand, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 95, 77, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.12.002 · DOI
  12. Boun My, 2019, Nudge and tax in an environmental public goods experiment: does environmental sensitivity matter?, Resour. Energy Econ, 55, 24, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2018.10.003 · DOI
  13. Briguglio, 2016, Household cooperation in waste management: initial conditions and intervention, J. Econ. Surv., 30, 497, 10.1111/joes.12156 · DOI
  14. Buckley, 2020, Prices, information and nudges for residential electricity conservation: a meta-analysis, Ecol. Econ., 172
  15. Bursztyn, 2017, Social image and economic behavior in the field: identifying, understanding, and shaping social pressure, Annu. Rev. Econ., 9, 131, 10.1146/annurev-economics-063016-103625 · DOI
  16. Carlsson, 2020, Behavioral spillover effects from a social information campaign, J. Environ. Econ. Manage.
  17. Chabé-Ferret, 2019, Can we nudge farmers into saving water? Evidence from a randomised experiment, Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ., 46, 393, 10.1093/erae/jbz022 · DOI
  18. Chakravarty, 2019, Using social norms to reduce paper waste: results from a field experiment in the Indian information technology sector, Ecol. Econ., 164, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106356 · DOI
  19. Conke, 2018, Barriers to waste recycling development: evidence from Brazil, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 134, 129, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.03.007 · DOI
  20. Costa, 2013, Energy conservation “nudges” and environmentalist ideology: evidence from a randomized residential electricity field experiment, J. Eur. Econ. Assoc., 11, 680, 10.1111/jeea.12011 · DOI
  21. Croson, 2014, Behavioral environmental economics: promises and challenges, Environ. Resour. Econ., 58, 335, 10.1007/s10640-014-9783-y · DOI
  22. Czajkowski, 2014, We want to sort! Assessing households’ preferences for sorting waste, Resour. Energy Econ, 36, 290, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.05.006 · DOI
  23. Czajkowski, 2019, Social norm nudging and preferences for household recycling, Resour. Energy Econ., 58, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2019.07.004 · DOI
  24. D'Adda, 2017, Push, don't nudge: behavioral spillovers and policy instruments, Econ. Lett., 154, 92, 10.1016/j.econlet.2017.02.029 · DOI
  25. Dolan, 2015, Like ripples on a pond: behavioral spillovers and their implications for research and policy, J. Econ. Psychol., 47, 1, 10.1016/j.joep.2014.12.003 · DOI
  26. Duflo, 2011, Nudging farmers to use fertilizer: theory and experimental evidence from Kenya, Am. Econ. Rev., 101, 2350, 10.1257/aer.101.6.2350 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Egebark, 2016, Can indifference make the world greener?, J. Environ. Econ. Manage, 76, 1, 10.1016/j.jeem.2015.11.004 · DOI
  28. Fanghella, 2019, On the use of nudges to affect spillovers in environmental behaviors, Front. Psychol., 10, 61, 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00061 · DOI
  29. Ferrara, 2012, A cross-country study of household waste prevention and recycling: assessing the effectiveness of policy instruments, Land Econ., 88, 710, 10.3368/le.88.4.710 · DOI
  30. Ferraro, 2011, The persistence of treatment effects with norm-based policy instruments: evidence from a randomized environmental policy experiment, Am. Econ. Rev., 101, 318, 10.1257/aer.101.3.318 · DOI
  31. Ferraro, 2013, Heterogeneous treatment effects and mechanisms in information-based environmental policies: evidence from a large-scale field experiment, Resour. Energy Econ., 35, 356, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2013.04.001 · DOI
  32. Ghesla, 2019, Nudge for good? Choice defaults and spillover effects, Front. Psychol., 10, 178, 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00178 · DOI
  33. Ghesla, 2020, Nudging the poor and the rich - a field study on the distributional effects of green electricity defaults, Energy Econ., 86, 10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104616 · DOI
  34. Graham, 2017, Communicating the climate impacts of meat consumption: the effect of values and message framing, Glob. Environ. Chang., 44, 98, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.03.004 · DOI
  35. Guerrero, 2013, Solid waste management challenges for cities in developing countries, Waste Manage, 33, 220, 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.09.008 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Hagman, 2015, Public views on policies involving nudges, Rev. Philos. Psychol., 6, 439, 10.1007/s13164-015-0263-2 · DOI
  37. Hajdu, 2017, The association between experiential and material expenditures and subjective well-being: new evidence from Hungarian survey data, J. Econ. Psychol., 62, 72, 10.1016/j.joep.2017.06.009 · DOI
  38. Halvorsen, 2008, Effects of norms and opportunity cost of time on household recycling, Land Econ., 84, 501, 10.3368/le.84.3.501 · DOI
  39. Han, 2017, The impact of the policy of municipal solid waste source-separated collection on waste reduction: a case study of China, J. Mater. Cycles Waste, 19, 382, 10.1007/s10163-015-0434-3 · DOI
  40. Hu, 2019, Educational gradient of health in rural China, Soc. Sci. J., 56, 127, 10.1016/j.soscij.2018.09.004 · DOI
  41. Irwin, 2013, Trust, culture, and cooperation: a social dilemma analysis of pro-environmental behaviors, Sociol. Q., 54, 424, 10.1111/tsq.12029 · DOI
  42. Jung, 2016, American attitudes toward nudges, Judgm. Decis. Mak., 11, 62, 10.1017/S1930297500007592 · DOI
  43. Kallbekken, 2013, ‘Nudging’ hotel guests to reduce food waste as a win-win environmental measure, Econ. Lett., 119, 325, 10.1016/j.econlet.2013.03.019 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Kinnaman, 2000, Garbage and recycling with endogenous local policy, J. Urban Econ., 48, 419, 10.1006/juec.2000.2174 · DOI
  45. Kirakozian, 2016, One without the other? Behavioural and incentive policies for household waste management, J. Econ. Surv., 30, 526, 10.1111/joes.12159 · DOI
  46. Kuhfuss, 2016, Nudges, social norms, and permanence in agri-environmental schemes, Land Econ., 92, 641, 10.3368/le.92.4.641 · DOI
  47. Kurz, 2018, Nudging to reduce meat consumption: immediate and persistent effects of an intervention at a university restaurant, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 90, 317, 10.1016/j.jeem.2018.06.005 · DOI
  48. Lacasse, 2016, Don't be satisfied, identify! Strengthening positive spillover by connecting pro-environmental behaviors to an “environmentalist” label, J. Environ. Psychol., 48, 149, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.09.006 · DOI
  49. Lai, 2020, Got milk? Using nudges to reduce consumption of added sugar, Am. J. Agr. Econ., 102, 154, 10.1093/ajae/aaz022 · DOI
  50. Lin, 2016, Visual prompts or volunteer models: an experiment in recycling, Sustainability-Basel, 8, 458, 10.3390/su8050458 · DOI
  51. List, 2015, The behavioralist as nutritionist: leveraging behavioral economics to improve child food choice and consumption, J. Health Econ., 39, 135, 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.11.002 · DOI
  52. Mani, 2013, Inducing peer pressure to promote cooperation, Sci. Rep., 3, 1735, 10.1038/srep01735 · DOI
  53. Marshall, 2013, Systems approaches to integrated solid waste management in developing countries, Waste Manage, 33, 988, 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.12.023 · DOI
  54. Moh, 2014, Overview of household solid waste recycling policy status and challenges in Malaysia, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 82, 50, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.11.004 · DOI
  55. Myers, 2020, Social comparison nudges without monetary incentives: evidence from home energy reports, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 101
  56. Nafziger, 2020, Spillover effects of nudges, Econ. Lett., 190, 10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109086 · DOI
  57. Nainggolan, 2019, Consumers in a circular economy: economic analysis of household waste sorting behaviour, Ecol. Econ., 166, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106402 · DOI
  58. Padilla, 2018, Waste disposal and households’ heterogeneity. Identifying factors shaping attitudes towards source-separated recycling in Bogotá, Colombia, Waste Manage., 74, 16, 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.11.052 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Pfaff, 2017, Spillovers from conservation programs, Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ., 9, 299, 10.1146/annurev-resource-100516-053543 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Pichert, 2008, Green defaults: information presentation and pro-environmental behaviour, J. Environ. Psychol., 28, 63, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.09.004 · DOI
  61. Reisch, 2017, Viewpoint: beyond carrots and sticks: europeans support health nudges, Food Policy, 69, 1, 10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.01.007 · DOI
  62. Rivers, 2017, Using nudges to reduce waste? The case of Toronto's plastic bag levy, J. Environ. Manage, 188, 153, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.12.009 · DOI
  63. Schubert, 2017, Green nudges: do they work? Are they ethical?, Ecol. Econ., 132, 329, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.11.009 · DOI
  64. Sintov, 2019, Cognitive accessibility as a new factor in proenvironmental spillover: results from a field study of household food waste management, Environ. Behav., 51, 50, 10.1177/0013916517735638 · DOI
  65. Smith, 2005, Does matching overcome Ialonde’s critique of nonexperimental estimators?, J. Econometrics, 125, 305, 10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.011 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Stoeva, 2017, Influence of recycling programmes on waste separation behaviour, Waste Manage, 68, 732, 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.06.005 · DOI
  67. Sunstein, 2014, Automatically green: behavioral economics and environmental protection, Harvard Environ. Law, 38, 127
  68. Tadesse, 2009, Environmental concern and its implication to household waste separation and disposal: evidence from Mekelle, Ethiopia, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 53, 183, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.11.009 · DOI
  69. Truelove, 2014, Positive and negative spillover of pro-environmental behavior: an integrative review and theoretical framework, Glob. Environ. Chang., 29, 127, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.004 · DOI
  70. Vallgårda, 2012, Nudge—A new and better way to improve health?, Health Policy (New York), 104, 200, 10.1016/j.healthpol.2011.10.013 · DOI
  71. Varotto, 2017, Psychological strategies to promote household recycling. A systematic review with meta-analysis of validated field interventions, J. Environ. Psychol., 51, 168, 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.03.011 · DOI
  72. Xu, 2017, External influences on forming residents’ waste separation behaviour: evidence from households in Hangzhou, China. Habitat Int., 63, 21, 10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.03.009 · DOI
  73. Xu, 2018, Economic incentive and social influence to overcome household waste separation dilemma: a field intervention study, Waste Manage, 77, 522, 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.04.048 · DOI
  74. Zhang, 2010, Municipal solid waste management in China: status, problems and challenges, J. Environ. Manage., 91, 1623, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.012 · DOI
  75. Zhang, 2016, What keeps Chinese from recycling: accessibility of recycling facilities and the behavior, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 109, 176, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.02.008 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, Z., & Wang, X.
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
162
Pages
105054
ISSN
0921-3449
DOI
10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105054
Cited by
61
References
3
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review