Cited by 151Extraction and Separation ProcessesElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureRecycling and Waste Management Techniques

Electric vehicle lithium-ion battery recycled content standards for the US – targets, costs, and environmental impacts

Open access
Dunn, Jessica, Kendall, Alissa, Slattery, Margaret·2022·Resources, Conservation and Recycling

Abstract

Lithium-ion battery recycling can decrease life cycle environmental impacts of electric vehicles (EVs) and assist in securing domestic supply chains. However, the US, the third largest market for EVs, has no policies for recycling of batteries at their end-of-life. The European Union has proposed recycled content standards (RCSs) to help drive a circular battery ecosystem. This analysis calculates feasible RCSs for the US based on future sale projections, techno-economic assessment, life cycle assessment, and material flow analysis. Using a 95% confidence interval, results show that 11–12% of cobalt, 7–8% of lithium, and 10–12% of nickel demand in 2030 and 15–18%, 9–11%, and 15–17%, respectively, in 2035, could be met by retired supply assuming closed-loop recycling. While domestic recycling can be profitable at scale and reduce environmental impacts, it is more expensive than exporting to China for recycling. Consequently, policy is likely needed to ensure critical materials are recycled domestically.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106488

Cites

46 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • While materials from battery recycling are expected to reduce environmental damage, raw material extraction will need to provide the lion's share of battery materials in the foreseeable future.

    “While materials from battery recycling are expected to reduce environmental damage, raw material extraction will need to provide the lion’s share of battery materials in the foreseeable future41–47.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Richa, K., Babbitt, C.W., Gaustad, G., Wang, X., 2014b. A future perspective on lithium- ion battery waste flows from electric vehicles. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 83, 63-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.11.008. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dunn, J., Kendall, A., & Slattery, M.
Affiliations
University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Kendall, Alissa
Venue
Resources, Conservation and Recycling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
185
Pages
106488
ISSN
0921-3449 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4284960973
Cited by
151
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 51 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 2
FWCI
10.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Resources Conservation and Recycling (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Transportation
  • National Center for Sustainable Transportation Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Recycling and Waste Management Techniques
Keywords
lithium-ion battery recycling, electric vehicles, critical raw materials, cobalt, lithium, nickel, closed-loop recycling, recycling costs, end-of-life batteries, circular economy, recycling policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review