Cited by 65Open Source Software InnovationsSoftware Engineering Techniques and PracticesDigital Platforms and Economics

Acceptance of Monetary Rewards in Open Source Software Development

Open access
Krishnamurthy, Sandeep, Ou, Shaosong, Tripathi, Arvind K.·2014·Research Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.respol.2013.10.007

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several scholars have argued that open source sustainability is a latent key issue that requires detailed study.

    “At the same time, several scholars have argued that open source sustainability is a latent key issue (Krishnamurthy et al., 2014), that requires detailed study (Von Krogh et al., 2012).”

    From The sustainability of open source commons (2023) · cites this paper as Krishnamurthy et al., 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krishnamurthy, S., Ou, S., & Tripathi, A. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington Bothell (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of Auckland (NZ)
Venue
Research Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
632-644
ISSN
0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064900668
Cited by
65
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research Policy (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Open Source Software Innovations
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
Keywords
open source software, monetary rewards, developer motivation, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, community motivation, ideological motivation, volunteering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review