Cited by 114Cerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Defining the active ingredients of interactive computer play interventions for children with neuromotor impairments: a scoping review

Levac, Danielle, Rivard, Lisa, Missiuna, Cheryl·2012·Research in Developmental Disabilities

Abstract

Rehabilitation researchers who investigate complex interventions are challenged to describe the "active ingredients" of their interventions: the reason(s) why a treatment is expected to be effective. Interactive Computer Play (ICP) is an emerging complex intervention in rehabilitation practice and research. The purpose of this scoping review is to identify the active ingredients of ICP interventions that are designed to improve motor outcomes in children with neuromotor impairments. Eleven potential active ingredients were identified with the following foci: ICP system or game properties; intervention effects on the user; and therapist roles. However, few studies explicitly evaluate the impact of particular ingredients on outcomes. Identification of active ingredients in ICP interventions can inform trial design and clinical decision-making. Research and clinical practice will benefit from studies that utilize a framework such as motor learning theory to guide hypotheses and measurement of the active ingredients of complex interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ridd.2011.09.007

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Levac, D., Rivard, L., & Missiuna, C.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • CanChild Centre for Childhood-onset Disability Research (CA)
Corresponding author
Levac, Danielle
Venue
Research in Developmental Disabilities
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
214-223
ISSN
0891-4222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2044808718
Cited by
114
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research in Developmental Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
active ingredients, complex interventions, neuromotor impairment, children, motor outcome, rehabilitation, motor learning theory, therapist role, intervention design
MeSH terms
Child, Communication Devices for People with Disabilities, Communication Aids for Disabled, Humans, Motor Skills, Neuromuscular Diseases, Therapy, Computer-Assisted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review