A decade of CASP: progress, bottlenecks and prognosis in protein structure prediction

Moult, John·2005·Current Opinion in Structural Biology

DOI 10.1016/j.sbi.2005.05.011

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sbi.2005.05.011

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Wisdom of crowds for robust gene network inference
The DREAM5 Consortium, Marbach, D., Costello, J. C., Küffner, R., Vega, N. M., Prill, R. J., Camacho, D. M., Allison, K. R., Kellis, M., Collins, J. J., et al. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2016 · Cited by 1,667
The Protein-Folding Problem, 50 Years On
Dill, K. A., & MacCallum, J. L. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1219021 · Cited by 1,699
The Protein Folding Problem
Dill, K. A., Ozkan, S. B., Shell, M. S., & Weikl, T. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Biophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.092707.153558 · Cited by 1,163
Protein 3D Structure Computed from Evolutionary Sequence Variation
Marks, D. S., Colwell, L. J., Sheridan, R., Hopf, T. A., Pagnani, A., Zecchina, R., & Sander, C. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028766 · Cited by 1,144
lDDT: a local superposition-free score for comparing protein structures and models using distance difference tests
Mariani, V., Biasini, M., Barbato, A., & Schwede, T. (2013) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt473 · Cited by 1,138
Deep learning for computational chemistry
Goh, G. B., Hodas, N. O., & Vishnu, A. (2017) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.24764 · Cited by 809
Comparative protein structure modeling using MODELLER
Webb, B., & Sali, A. (2016) · Current Protocols in Protein Science · doi:10.1002/cpps.20 · Cited by 730
“Improving the performance and accuracy of methods in this regime remains one of the main tasks of comparative modeling today (Moult, 2005).”
Method
Comparative modeling for protein structure prediction
Ginalski, K. (2006) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2006.02.003 · Cited by 296
Overcoming barriers to NLP for clinical text: the role of shared tasks and the need for additional creative solutions
Chapman, W. W., Nadkarni, P. M., Hirschman, L., D'Avolio, L. W., Savova, G. K., & Uzuner, O. (2011) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000465 · Cited by 296
Progress in Modeling of Protein Structures and Interactions.
Schueler-Furman, O., Wang, C., Bradley, P., Misura, K., & Baker, D. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1112160 · Cited by 294
Artificial Intelligence and Biosensors in Healthcare and Its Clinical Relevance: A Review
(2023) · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3285596 · Cited by 205
An Automated Model Test System for Systematic Development and Improvement of Gene Expression Models
Reis, A. C., & Salis, H. M. (2020) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.0c00394 · Cited by 166
β‐Rolls, β‐Helices, and Other β‐Solenoid Proteins
Kajava, A. V., & Steven, A. C. (2006) · Advances in Protein Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0065-3233(06)73003-0 · Cited by 149
A method for multiple-sequence-alignment-free protein structure prediction using a protein language model
Fang, X., Wang, F., Liu, L., He, J., Lin, D., Xiang, Y., Zhu, K., Zhang, X., Wu, H., Li, H., et al. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00721-6 · Cited by 132
Current structure predictors are not learning the physics of protein folding
Outeiral, C., Nissley, D. A., & Deane, C. M. (2022) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btab881 · Cited by 82
CASP13 target classification into tertiary structure prediction categories
Kinch, L. N., Kryshtafovych, A., Monastyrskyy, B., & Grishin, N. V. (2019) · Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.25775 · Cited by 36
The KiTS21 Challenge: Automatic segmentation of kidneys, renal tumors, and renal cysts in corticomedullary-phase CT
Heller, N., Isensee, F., Trofimova, D., Tejpaul, R., Zhao, Z., Chen, H., Wang, L., Golts, A., Khapun, D., Shats, D., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2307.01984 · Cited by 35
“One of the ﬁrst machine learning competitions to use this format was the Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction or “CASP” competition which has been followed by a sequel CASP event every even-numbered year since 1994 [39].”
Method
Predicting improved protein conformations with a temporal deep recurrent neural network
Pfeiffenberger, E., & Bates, P. A. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0202652 · Cited by 21
Assessing the binding properties of CASP14 targets and models
Egbert, M., Ghani, U., Ashizawa, R., Kotelnikov, S., Nguyen, T., Desta, I., Hashemi, N., Padhorny, D., Kozakov, D., & Vajda, S. (2021) · Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/prot.26209 · Cited by 10
Evaluation of crowdsourced mortality prediction models as a framework for assessing artificial intelligence in medicine
Bergquist, T., Schaffter, T., Yan, Y., Yu, T., Prosser, J., Gao, J., Chen, G., Charzewski, Ł., Nawalany, Z., Brugere, I., et al. (2023) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocad159 · Cited by 8

Authors: Moult, J.
Venue: Current Opinion in Structural Biology
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Published: 2005-06
Volume: 15
Issue: 3
Pages: 285-289
ISSN: 0959-440X (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2005.05.011
OpenAlex: W2073758233
Cited by: 484
References: 0
FWCI: 2.12
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review