The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychological and Socio-demographic Predictors of Attitudes toward Animals
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Gender differences are well documented in the literature, with women consistently showing higher levels of empathy and concern regarding animal suffering, holding more positive attitudes towards animals and being more engaged in animal protection and less prone to animal exploitation, animal abuse and cruelty [13,29,31,32,33,34].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Attachment to animals is associated with empathy, attitudes and prosocial behavior towards them [13,39] and with anthropomorphism [65,212,214].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“These factors appear to be linked and influence each other, affecting people’s attitudes and beliefs towards animals and the way they are considered, treated and cared for [12,13,27,60,61].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“For more than 40 years, studies have shown that the human–animal relationship, especially that with domestic and companion animals, is the result of a complex interactions between biological, psychological, social and cultural factors [12,13,14,15,16,17].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“Apostol et al. [13], for example, reported that gender was a good predictor of attitudes towards animals, together with empathy towards animals, anthropomorphic beliefs and owning a companion animal.”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“In addition, sociodemographic variables, such as gender, age, family structure, education level and previous experiences with animals, play a role [8,12,13,28,29,30].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
In the citing paper
“there is a link between anthropomorphism, empathy and attachment towards nonhuman agents, particularly animals [13,103,212].”
From The Complexity of the Human–Animal Bond: Empathy, Attachment and Anthropomorphism in Human–Animal Relationships and Animal Hoarding (2022) · cites this paper as [13]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors
Eisenberg, N., & Miller, P. A. (1987) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.1.91 · Cited by 2,672
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Kellert, 1980, American attitudes toward and knowledge of animals: An update, International Journal of the Study of Animal Problems, 1, 87
- Hills, 1993, The motivational bases of attitudes toward animals, Society & Animals, 1, 111, 10.1163/156853093X00028 · DOI
- Kidd, 1989, Factors in adults’ attitudes toward pets, Psychological Reports, 65, 903, 10.2466/pr0.1989.65.3.903 · DOI
- Serpell, 2004, Factors influencing human attitudes to animals and their welfare, Animal Welfare, 13, 145, 10.1017/S0962728600014500 · DOI · Paper page
- Herzog, 2007, Gender differences in human-animal interactions: a review, Anthrozoös, 20, 7, 10.2752/089279307780216687 · DOI · Paper page
- Herzog, 1991, Gender, sex role identity and attitudes toward animals, Anthrozoös, 4, 184, 10.2752/089279391787057170 · DOI
- Daly, 2009, Empathic differences in adults as a function of childhood and adult pet ownership and pet type, Anthrozoös, 22, 371, 10.2752/089279309X12538695316383 · DOI · Paper page
- Mathews, 1997, Personality and attitudes towards the treatment of animals, Society & Animals, 5, 57
- Furnham, 2003, Personality, empathy and attitudes to animal welfare, Anthrozoös, 16, 135, 10.2752/089279303786992260 · DOI · Paper page
- Taylor, 2005, Empathy and attitudes to animals, Anthrozoös, 18, 18, 10.2752/089279305785594342 · DOI
- Signal, 2007, Attitudes to animals and empathy: comparing animal protection and general community samples, Anthrozoös, 20, 125, 10.2752/175303707X207918 · DOI · Paper page
- Knight, 2004, Attitudes to animals and belief in animal mind, Anthrozoös, 17, 43, 10.2752/089279304786991945 · DOI · Paper page
- Hills, 1995, Empathy and belief in the mental experience of animals, Anthrozoös, 8, 132, 10.2752/089279395787156347 · DOI · Paper page
- Waytz, 2010, Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 219, 10.1177/1745691610369336 · DOI · Paper page
- Eisenberg, N., (2000). Empathy and sympathy. In M. Lewis, & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of Emotion (2nd ed.) (pp. 677-691). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Davis, 1980, A Multidimensional Approach to Individual Differences in Empathy, JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85
- Paul, 2000, Empathy with animals and with humans: are they linked?, Anthrozoös, 13, 194, 10.2752/089279300786999699 · DOI · Paper page
- Powell, G.M. (2010). The role of individual differences and involvement on attitudes toward animal welfare. (Master's thesis, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, US). Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle.net/2097/4235.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prato-Previde, E., Basso Ricci, E., & Colombo, E. S. (2022) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani12202835 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Apostol, L., Rebega, O. L., & Miclea, M.
- Venue
- Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 78
- Pages
- 521-525
- ISSN
- 1877-0428
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
