Cited by 75

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychological and Socio-demographic Predictors of Attitudes toward Animals

Apostol, Livia, Rebega, Oana Luiza, Miclea, Mircea·2013·Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.343

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Kellert, 1980, American attitudes toward and knowledge of animals: An update, International Journal of the Study of Animal Problems, 1, 87
  2. Hills, 1993, The motivational bases of attitudes toward animals, Society & Animals, 1, 111, 10.1163/156853093X00028 · DOI
  3. Kidd, 1989, Factors in adults’ attitudes toward pets, Psychological Reports, 65, 903, 10.2466/pr0.1989.65.3.903 · DOI
  4. Serpell, 2004, Factors influencing human attitudes to animals and their welfare, Animal Welfare, 13, 145, 10.1017/S0962728600014500 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Herzog, 2007, Gender differences in human-animal interactions: a review, Anthrozoös, 20, 7, 10.2752/089279307780216687 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Herzog, 1991, Gender, sex role identity and attitudes toward animals, Anthrozoös, 4, 184, 10.2752/089279391787057170 · DOI
  7. Daly, 2009, Empathic differences in adults as a function of childhood and adult pet ownership and pet type, Anthrozoös, 22, 371, 10.2752/089279309X12538695316383 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Mathews, 1997, Personality and attitudes towards the treatment of animals, Society & Animals, 5, 57
  9. Furnham, 2003, Personality, empathy and attitudes to animal welfare, Anthrozoös, 16, 135, 10.2752/089279303786992260 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Taylor, 2005, Empathy and attitudes to animals, Anthrozoös, 18, 18, 10.2752/089279305785594342 · DOI
  11. Signal, 2007, Attitudes to animals and empathy: comparing animal protection and general community samples, Anthrozoös, 20, 125, 10.2752/175303707X207918 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Knight, 2004, Attitudes to animals and belief in animal mind, Anthrozoös, 17, 43, 10.2752/089279304786991945 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hills, 1995, Empathy and belief in the mental experience of animals, Anthrozoös, 8, 132, 10.2752/089279395787156347 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Waytz, 2010, Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 219, 10.1177/1745691610369336 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Eisenberg, N., (2000). Empathy and sympathy. In M. Lewis, & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of Emotion (2nd ed.) (pp. 677-691). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  16. Davis, 1980, A Multidimensional Approach to Individual Differences in Empathy, JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85
  17. Paul, 2000, Empathy with animals and with humans: are they linked?, Anthrozoös, 13, 194, 10.2752/089279300786999699 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Powell, G.M. (2010). The role of individual differences and involvement on attitudes toward animal welfare. (Master's thesis, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, US). Retrieved from: http://hdl.handle.net/2097/4235.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Apostol, L., Rebega, O. L., & Miclea, M.
Venue
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
78
Pages
521-525
ISSN
1877-0428
Cited by
75
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review