Cited by 138Smart Cities and TechnologiesE-Government and Public ServicesInnovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development

Digital Dimension of Smart City: Critical Analysis

Open access
Jucevičius, Robertas, Patašienė, Irena, Patašius, Martynas·2014·Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Abstract

The analyses of publications show unclear differences between the definition of a digital city and a smart city. The critical analysis of references allows us to define the role of a digital dimension of a smart city. A deeper analysis of the concept of smart social systems shows that many social systems can be smart without necessarily basing their activities on Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). That is affirmed by the model of Jucevičius et al. (2013), where the social system is investigated taking into account its relationship with the environment. The paper considers the importance of a digital platform for the smart social systems of the city. Theoretical considerations have been used to develop a conceptual model for evaluation of the importance of a digital dimension for a smart city.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.137

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Dameri, R.P. & Cocchia, A. (2013). Smart City and Digital City: Twenty Years of Terminology Evolution, X Conference of the Italian Chapter of AIS, ITAIS 2013, Università Commerciale Luigi Bocconi, Milan (Italy), 1-8.
  2. Jucevicius, R., Ligailaite-Razvickiene, L. (2013) Smart Development. Proceedings of the 10 th International Conference on Intelectual Capital, Knowledge Management & Organisation Learning, 212-219.

Authors
Jucevičius, R., Patašienė, I., & Patašius, M.
Affiliations
Kaunas University of Technology (LT)
Corresponding author
Jucevičius, Robertas
Venue
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
156
Pages
146-150
ISSN
1877-0428 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1979571393
Cited by
138
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4
FWCI
7.94
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
European Social Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Smart Cities and Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Keywords
smart cities, digital city, information and communication technologies, digital platforms, social systems, conceptual model, urban evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review