The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809 · cited 1×
“This implies that collaboration effectiveness, in terms of knowledge-creation, can be determined by the variety and intensity of organization’s external ties (Huggins, Johnston, & Thompson, 2012; Nonaka, 1994; Simonin, 1997).”
BackgroundSocial Capital: Prospects for a New Concept
Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/4134367 · Cited by 9,665 · cited 2×
“Accordingly, and by reflecting on the UIC setting, universities and companies may seek collaboration to better understand and consider the interests of all relevant stakeholders in their key operational and strategic decisions (Adler & Kwon, 2002).”
BackgroundInterorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259373 · Cited by 7,111
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.4.375 · Cited by 5,649
Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university–industry collaboration
Bruneel, J., D’Este, P., & Salter, A. (2010) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.006 · Cited by 1,400
Resources, Knowledge and Influence: The Organizational Effects of Interorganizational Collaboration*
Hardy, C., Phillips, N., & Lawrence, T. B. (2003) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00342 · Cited by 741
Kaufmann, A., & Tödtling, F. (2001) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00118-9 · Cited by 526
The relevance of systematic reviews to educational policy and practice
Davies, P. (2000) · Oxford Review of Education · doi:10.1080/713688543 · Cited by 286
Cited by
The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints
Compagnucci, L., & Spigarelli, F. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120284 · Cited by 892
Knowledge transfer in university–industry research partnerships: a review
de Wit-de Vries, E., Dolfsma, W. A., van der Windt, H. J., & Gerkema, M. P. (2019) · The Journal of Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10961-018-9660-x · Cited by 426
What makes industry–university collaboration succeed? A systematic review of the literature
Rybnicek, R., & Königsgruber, R. (2019) · Journal of Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11573-018-0916-6 · Cited by 404
Entrepreneurship education: Time for a change in research direction?
Ratten, V., & Usmanij, P. (2021) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100367 · Cited by 404
Romero-Sánchez, A., Perdomo-Charry, G., & Burbano-Vallejo, E. L. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27258 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Ankrah, S., & AL-Tabbaa, O.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 387-408
- ISSN
- 0956-5221 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3123301243
- Cited by
- 980
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 11.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003
- The paper
- Ankrah, S., & AL-Tabbaa, O. (2015). Universities–industry collaboration: A systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2015.02.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
