Cited by 123Schizophrenia research and treatmentBipolar Disorder and TreatmentMental Health and Psychiatry

A prospective 3-year longitudinal study of cognitive predictors of relapse in first-episode schizophrenic patients

Chen, Eric Yu-Hai, Hui, Christy Lai-Ming, Dunn, Eva Lai-Wah, Miao, May Yin-King, Yeung, Wai-Song, Wong, Chi-Keung, Chan, Wah-Fat, Tang, Wai-Nang·2005·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

Background Cognitive predictors of relapse have been extensively explored only in few long term longitudinal studies of first-episode schizophrenia.Method This study prospectively followed 93 patients with first-episode schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder, and schizoaffective disorder for 3 years after their first-episode illness. Cognitive domains including verbal intelligence, verbal and visual memory, verbal fluency, and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance were investigated as potential predictors of relapse.Results We found that by the first year 21% patients had relapsed, by the second year 33% had relapsed, and by the third year 40% had relapsed. There was a significant difference in the relapse rate between patients with good adherence and patients with poor adherence to medication regimes. A multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that after controlling for medication adherence, perseverative error in the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test was the only cognitive function that significantly predict relapse with an odds ratio of 2.4.Conclusions Cognitive flexibility in set shifting is related to tendency towards relapse in first-episode schizophrenic patients. Other cognitive factors appear not to be related to relapse. Possible mechanisms included the link between prefrontal dysfunction and sub-cortical dopamine system stability, as well as the effects of executive dysfunction on insight impairment and adherence behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2005.02.020

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, E. Y.-H., Hui, C. L.-M., Dunn, E. L.-W., Miao, M. Y.-K., Yeung, W.-S., Wong, C.-K., Chan, W.-F., & Tang, W.-N.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary Hospital (CN)
  • Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Eric Yu-Hai
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-09
Volume
77
Issue
1
Pages
99-104
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117484440
Cited by
123
References
23
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Hong Kong
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
first-episode schizophrenia, recurrence prediction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Intelligence Tests, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Severity of Illness Index, Verbal Behavior, Confidence Intervals, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review