The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The MCCB impairment profile for schizophrenia outpatients: Results from the MATRICS psychometric and standardization study
Open accessAbstract
The MATRICS Psychometric and Standardization Study was conducted as a final stage in the development of the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). The study included 176 persons with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and 300 community residents. Data were analyzed to examine the cognitive profile of clinically stable schizophrenia patients on the MCCB. Secondarily, the data were analyzed to identify which combination of cognitive domains and corresponding cut-off scores best discriminated patients from community residents, and patients competitively employed vs. those not. Raw scores on the ten MCCB tests were entered into the MCCB scoring program which provided age- and gender-corrected T-scores on seven cognitive domains. To test for between-group differences, we conducted a 2 (group)×7 (cognitive domain) MANOVA with follow-up independent t-tests on the individual domains. Classification and regression trees (CART) were used for the discrimination analyses. Examination of patient T-scores across the seven cognitive domains revealed a relatively compact profile with T-scores ranging from 33.4 for speed of processing to 39.3 for reasoning and problem-solving. Speed of processing and social cognition best distinguished individuals with schizophrenia from community residents; speed of processing along with visual learning and attention/vigilance optimally distinguished patients competitively employed from those who were not. The cognitive profile findings provide a standard to which future studies can compare results from other schizophrenia samples and related disorders; the classification results point to specific areas and levels of cognitive impairment that may advance work rehabilitation efforts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Recently, the reliability, validity, and practicality of functionally meaningful co-primary measures was established,68 and the MCCB impairment profile for schizophrenia outpatients became available.69”
From Clinical trials of potential cognitive-enhancing drugs in schizophrenia: what have we learned so far? (2013) · cites this paper as [69]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Classification and Regression Trees.
Gordon, A. D., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1984) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2530946 · Cited by 23,867
Classification and Regression Trees.
Ryzin, J. V., Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2288003 · Cited by 21,030
(1995) · Cited by 2,809
Neurocognitive deficit in schizophrenia: A quantitative review of the evidence.
Heinrichs, R. W., & Zakzanis, K. K. (1998) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.12.3.426 · Cited by 2,798
The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery, part 1: test selection, reliability, and validity
Nuechterlein, K. H., Green, M. F., Kern, R. S., Baade, L. E., Barch, D. M., Cohen, J. D., Essock, S., Fenton, W. S., Frese, F. J., Gold, J. M., et al. (2008) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.07010042 · Cited by 2,342
Benton, A. (1994) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.45.1.1 · Cited by 2,298
Identification of separable cognitive factors in schizophrenia
Nuechterlein, K. H., Barch, D. M., Gold, J. M., Goldberg, T. E., Green, M. F., & Heaton, R. K. (2004) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/j.schres.2004.09.007 · Cited by 1,304
Birchwood, M., Smith, J., Cochrane, R., Wetton, S., & Copestake, S. (1990) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.157.6.853 · Cited by 1,157
Neurocognition in first-episode schizophrenia: a meta-analytic review.
Mesholam-Gately, R. I., Giuliano, A. J., Goff, K. P., Faraone, S. V., & Seidman, L. J. (2009) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/a0014708 · Cited by 1,130
Memory Impairment in Schizophrenia: A Meta-Analysis
Aleman, A., Hijman, R., de Haan, E. H. F., & Kahn, R. S. (1999) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.156.9.1358 · Cited by 1,093
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Lukoff, 1986, Appendix A: manual for the expanded brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS), Schizophr. Bull., 12, 594
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cognitive Deficits in Psychotic Disorders: A Lifespan Perspective
Sheffield, J. M., Karcher, N. R., & Barch, D. M. (2018) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-018-9388-2 · Cited by 466
Metagenome-wide association of gut microbiome features for schizophrenia
Zhu, F., Ju, Y., Wang, W., Wang, Q., Guo, R., Ma, Q., Sun, Q., Fan, Y., Xie, Y., Yang, Z., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15457-9 · Cited by 409
Auditory dysfunction in schizophrenia: integrating clinical and basic features
Javitt, D. C., & Sweet, R. A. (2015) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn4002 · Cited by 377
Maj, M., van Os, J., De Hert, M., Gaebel, W., Galderisi, S., Green, M. F., Guloksuz, S., Harvey, P. D., Jones, P. B., Malaspina, D., et al. (2021) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20809 · Cited by 285
O’Driscoll, C., Laing, J., & Mason, O. J. (2014) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2014.07.002 · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- Kern, R. S., Gold, J. M., Dickinson, D., Green, M. F., Nuechterlein, K. H., Baade, L. E., Keefe, R. S. E., Mesholam-Gately, R. I., Seidman, L. J., Lee, C., Sugar, C. A., & Marder, S. R.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- University of Kansas (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kern, Robert S.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Schizophrenia Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 124-131
- ISSN
- 0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3050090
- OpenAlex
- W2128456675
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 6.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (n01mh022006-001)
- National Institute of Mental Health (N01 MH022006)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Outpatients, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Psychotic Disorders, Reference Values, Schizophrenia, Social Adjustment, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
