Cited by 77Schizophrenia research and treatmentHallucinations in medical conditionsMental Health and Psychiatry

Auditory verbal hallucinations and cognitive functioning in healthy individuals

Open access
Daalman, Kirstin, van Zandvoort, Martine, Bootsman, Florian, Boks, Marco, Kahn, René, Sommer, Iris·2011·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

Auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) are a characteristic symptom in schizophrenia, and also occur in the general, non-clinical population. In schizophrenia patients, several specific cognitive deficits, such as in speech processing, working memory, source memory, attention, inhibition, episodic memory and self-monitoring have been associated with auditory verbal hallucinations. Such associations are interesting, as they may identify specific cognitive traits that constitute a predisposition for AVH. However, it is difficult to disentangle a specific relation with AVH in patients with schizophrenia, as so many other factors can affect the performance on cognitive tests. Examining the cognitive profile of healthy individuals experiencing AVH may reveal a more direct association between AVH and aberrant cognitive functioning in a specific domain. For the current study, performance in executive functioning, memory (both short- and long-term), processing speed, spatial ability, lexical access, abstract reasoning, language and intelligence performance was compared between 101 healthy individuals with AVH and 101 healthy controls, matched for gender, age, handedness and education. Although performance of both groups was within the normal range, not clinically impaired, significant differences between the groups were found in the verbal domain as well as in executive functioning. Performance on all other cognitive domains was similar in both groups. The predisposition to experience AVH is associated with lower performance in executive functioning and aberrant language performance. This association might be related to difficulties in the inhibition of irrelevant verbal information.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.schres.2011.07.013

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Healthy individuals develop different beliefs about the origins of the voices: from within myself in 41% vs. from others in 42% cases, 17% are uncertain if these voices are real or not.

    “Healthy individuals develop different beliefs about the origins of the voices (from within myself in 41% vs. from others in 42% cases), 17% are uncertain if these voices are real or not [19]”

    From The “common” experience of voice-hearing and its relationship with shame and guilt: a systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [19]

    Section 2.1.1 says the study measured healthy participants’ beliefs about the origin of their voices, and Table 4 reports their mean conviction that the voices came from external causes. Neither passage reports the claimed 41%/42% split or says that 17% were uncertain whether the voices were real. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lezak, M.D., Loring, D.W., Howieson, D.B., 2004. Neuropsychological Assessment4th Ed. Oxford University Press, New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Daalman, K., van Zandvoort, M., Bootsman, F., Boks, M., Kahn, R., & Sommer, I.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
Corresponding author
Daalman, Kirstin
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-11
Volume
132
Issue
2-3
Pages
203-207
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991045624
Cited by
77
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hallucinations in medical conditions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
auditory verbal hallucinations, executive function
MeSH terms
Adult, Cognition, Female, Hallucinations, Humans, Male, Memory, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Verbal Learning, Multivariate Analysis, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review