Cited by 101Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesSleep and Wakefulness Research

Replay of Episodic Memories in the Rat

Open access
Panoz-Brown, Danielle, Iyer, Vishakh, Carey, Lawrence M., Sluka, Christina M., Rajic, Gabriela, Kestenman, Jesse, Gentry, Meredith, Brotheridge, Sydney +8 more·2018·Current Biology

Abstract

Vivid episodic memories in people have been characterized as the replay of multiple unique events in sequential order [1-3]. The hippocampus plays a critical role in episodic memories in both people and rodents [2, 4-6]. Although rats remember multiple unique episodes [7, 8], it is currently unknown if animals "replay" episodic memories. Therefore, we developed an animal model of episodic memory replay. Here, we show that rats can remember a trial-unique stream of multiple episodes and the order in which these events occurred by engaging hippocampal-dependent episodic memory replay. We document that rats rely on episodic memory replay to remember the order of events rather than relying on non-episodic memories. Replay of episodic memories survives a long retention-interval challenge and interference from the memory of other events, which documents that replay is part of long-term episodic memory. The chemogenetic activating drug clozapine N-oxide (CNO), but not vehicle, reversibly impairs episodic memory replay in rats previously injected bilaterally in the hippocampus with a recombinant viral vector containing an inhibitory designer receptor exclusively activated by a designer drug (DREADD; AAV8-hSyn-hM4Di-mCherry). By contrast, two non-episodic memory assessments are unaffected by CNO, showing selectivity of this hippocampal-dependent impairment. Our approach provides an animal model of episodic memory replay, a process by which the rat searches its representations in episodic memory in sequential order to find information. Our findings using rats suggest that the ability to replay a stream of episodic memories is quite old in the evolutionary timescale.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2018.04.006

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Damage to the hippocampus is associated with defects in episodic-related memory functions in monkeys and rodents.

    “research in these studies shows that damage to the hippocampus is associated with defects in episodic-related memory functions in monkeys [112] and rodents [66,113,114].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [114]

  • To access incidentally encoded information, an animal must recall a holistic representation of the episode, containing many details surrounding the event as well as the event narrative sequence, and subsequently replay, target and manipulate this information within the event representation.

    “To access incidentally encoded information, an animal must recall a holistic representation of the episode, containing many details surrounding the event as well as the event narrative sequence, and subsequently replay, target and manipulate this information within the event representation [85,92,94,114].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [114]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [28]Baddeley AD Hitch G 1974 Working memory Psychology of learning and motivation 8 Elsevier 47 89

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Panoz-Brown, D., Iyer, V., Carey, L. M., Sluka, C. M., Rajic, G., Kestenman, J., Gentry, M., Brotheridge, S., Somekh, I., Corbin, H. E., Tucker, K. G., Almeida, B., Hex, S. B., Garcia, K. D., Hohmann, A. G., & Crystal, J. D.
Affiliations
Indiana University Bloomington (US)
Corresponding author
Crystal, Jonathon D.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-05
Volume
28
Issue
10
Pages
1628-1634.e7
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2799800314
Cited by
101
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4
FWCI
7.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks Open (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (MH098985, AG044530, AG051753, AG053524, CA200417, DA041229, DA042584, T32 DA024628)
  • National Science Foundation (1460949)
  • Harlan Scholars Program
  • Brazil Scientific Mobility Program, Institute of International Education
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
episodic memory, memory replay, hippocampus, rats, sequence memory, order of events, long-term memory, memory interference, chemogenetics, DREADD, clozapine-N-oxide, hM4Di
MeSH terms
Animals, Hippocampus, Male, Mental Recall, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review